Full text: XIXth congress (Part B3,2)

1 as 
dge 
ruct 
fies 
lity, 
ling 
are 
3-D 
ires 
ses 
aper 
ling 
296, 
ing, 
3-D 
ble 
data 
use 
lity 
d in 
than 
ligh 
| for 
eng 
. At 
The 
and 
into 
ther 
rom 
3-D 
s all 
1ces 
ie 3- 
Zheng Wang 
  
2. AN EDGE AND TIN BASED APPROACH (ETBA) FOR BUILDING EXTRACTION AND RECONSTRUCTION 
ETBA consists of two components: an edge-based building classification process and a TIN-based building 
reconstruction process. 
2.] Edge-Based Building Classification 
Buildings are extracted by edge analysis and classification. Since contours have the same properties regarding shape 
and geometry as edges have, ETBA can work with contours as well. For simplification, edges are used to represent both 
of them in the rest portion of the paper. Edges are detected from an elevation image generated by a terrain surface data. 
Detected edges usually represent buildings and other objects that stand out of the ground surface. The purpose of edge 
analysis and classification is to separate buildings from other objects, mainly trees, by using shape and geometric 
information contained in edges. The edge analysis is responsible for quantitatively deriving shape and geometric 
measurements from edges. And, the classification takes care of extracting building edges based on their shape and 
geometric measurements. 
Geometric properties, such as orthogonality and parallelism, have been widely used as constraints for building 
extraction in many previous researches. In this approach, besides orthogonality and parallelism, symmetry and 
circularity are two additional properties to be used. Here, the circularity is defined as the ratio of an edge's length (L) 
over its area (A): C=L?/A. For a circle, C=4B, and for a square, C=16. Instead of line segments, this approach uses closed 
edges, which allows analyzing the symmetry and circularity of an object. Symmetry and circularity describe an object's 
shape as a whole, and only a closed edge can represent it. Since almost all building edges are closed, this constraint 
actually only filter out non-building edges. Circularity is chosen because it is a measure of object boundary's complexity 
for covering an area. Most buildings have simpler boundaries than tree edges have, which means that the circularity of a 
building edge is smaller. Usually for an equal length, a building edge covers a larger area than a tree edge does. 
Symmetry is selected for object classification because most buildings have symmetric or semi-symmetric (i.e., symmetric 
referring only to one axis) shapes, but most non-building objects do not have symmetry. ETBA uses 3"-order 
normalized moments to represent symmetry. There is one problem, however, with the traditional normalized moments: 
they are only invariant to translation and scale changes, but variant to rotation. Since the symmetry of an object is 
measured against the axes of the coordinate system where the object is located, a rotation will change the measure of the 
symmetry of the object. Therefore, a rotation, which can rotate an object to its symmetric orientation, has to be applied 
to the object before symmetry can be calculated. Such a rotation makes an orientation normalization. In mechanics, there 
is an inertia-tensor-based rotation that can rotate an object to its principal axis so that around the axis the object will 
rotate with minimum inertia (Jáhne, 1995). This approach borrows the inertia-tensor concept and applies it to obtain the 
orientation normalization. A flowchart of the edge-based building classification is given in figure 1. 
Edges 
  
Generic Geometric Condition Checks 
(Size, Height, and Closure) 
| 
| Orientation Normalization 
| 
Moments (Symmetry) and 
Circularity Computations 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Classification on Symmetry & Circularity | 
| | 
| Straight Segments Extraction | | Right Corners Detection | 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
| Orthogonality & Parallel Checks 
| 
Building Edges 
  
  
Figure 1. A flowchart of the edge-based building classification 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam 2000. 989 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.