Natalia Moskal
N OF THE 1.1 Photogrammetry measuring suggests quantities measured directly on photos. Usually they are flat right-angled
coordinate of point. When the mathematical processing is carried on the results are usually adjusted according to the
classical scheme.
1Type of values subjecte. d to 1.1 Photogrammetrical - | PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PROBLEMS ]
adjustment servey
1.2 Function of Photogram l. Partial calibrating of the photographs
metrical survey
1.3 Control data 2. Complete calibrating
J 3. Self calibrating
2. Errors data nature 2.1 Just occasional 4. Reverse photogrammetric intersection
2.2 Occasional and 5. Double photogrammetric intersection
systematical
2.3 No errors or they are 6. Direct repeated intersection
n scheme of disdainfully small
h is universal J 7 Relative orientation of a couple of the
antities, their photographs
atical model,
ess series of 3. The possibility of including 3.1 YES 8. Relative orientation of three photographs
zed model of the systematic errors to 3.2 NO 9. Phototriangulation as to the Join-method
r elements of adjustment
rvation). The J 10. Phototriangulation as to the method of
al abilities of the models
4.Function of losses 4.1 Square 11. Formation of quasiphotograph
4.2 Unsquare 12. Geodetic orientation of the
4.3 Mixed route model
U
5. Is the codispersive matrix | 5.1 YES 13. Geodetic orientation of the model (the
ntal task Mi known couple of photographs)
age. Various SNO
| survey. The y
ing results oi 6. The matrix weight of | 6.1 YES 14. Research stereophotogram-
to elaborate photogrammetrycs metrical devises
data known 6.2 NO
re put for the U
Generalized 7. The existance of additional 7.1 YES
cal model of geometrical conditions 22 NO
Pic.1. The choice of the model for mathematical processing photogrammetry survey
1.2 The space photogrammetry coordinates of point of model are considered to be the functions of 1.1-type quantities.
ROBLRMS If one includes them in the adjustment he should use well-known theorem [1] to get strong theoretical solution. The
theorem [1] states that if there is adjustment of F - functions of correlated measuringY and the matrix is introduced
taining mail ;
in differen Ocex o, dn
t do not need then the result gained will be identical with the adjustment of values measured directly.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam 2000. 625