Full text: XIXth congress (Part B5,1)

TU. C CD 7 
Vi ud LV 
eA Mu dee 
Godding, Robert 
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
N 
0.6 0.6 
N 
m 0.5 05 mn 
= N = 
z N 04 LiT e 
t N = 
p 0.3 + 
3 =. S 
£ : E 
-06 -05 04 -03 02 -01 0 01 02 03 04 05 07 -08 ; 05: 04: 03,02 04 :0 
minor strain q, [-] minor strain q, [-] 
Figure 11: FLD (calculated from measured data) and FLC Figure 12: FLD (FEM-simulation) 
6 CONCLUSION 
The quality of a car body is substantially determined by the stamping parts. This results in increased requirements on 
the accuracy of the stamping parts produced in press shops. However, these requirements can only be fulfilled by an 
optimal layout of the forming process and a 100% quality control in the press shops both during the tool try-out and 
during the production by means of optical measuring techniques. 
Therefore, a new photogrammetric measuring system for the assessment of sheet metal parts in terms of shape accuracy 
and strain distribution has been developed within the Brite/EuRam project “DIGIMAN”. Based on the optically 
measured geometric parameters of the stamping part the system is able to detect deviations from the desired geometry 
with springback analysis and critical strain distributions utilizing visioplasticity. A first prototype was installed at the 
Institute for Metal Forming and Metal Forming Machine Tools (IFUM) of the University of Hanover. In the future it is 
planned to implement further industrial photogrammetric systems for the measurement of large-size outer-body panels 
with adequate accuracy in press shops at different car manufactures and producers of sheet metal parts. 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
Parts of this research work were funded by the European Community within the Brite/EuRam project BE-4798 
“Digital Imaging Techniques for Surface Quality Assessment in Manufacturing Industry (DIGIMAN). 
REFERNENCES 
/1/ Shi, M.: Strain Hardening and Forming Limits of Automotive Sheets. Proc. of the SAE Conf. SP-1067, p. 87- 
94, 1995. 
/2/ Zünkler, B.: Zur Problematik des Blechhalterdruckes beim Tiefziehen. Blech Rohre Profile 32 (1985) 7, p. 
323-326. 
/3/ Radlmayr, K.-M.; Ponschab, H.; Blaimschein, M.: Formability and Component Tests for Higher Strength 
Automotive Steel Sheets. Proc. of the IDDRG 1994, p. 31-46. 
/4/ | Usuda, M.; Yoshida, M. et al.: Forming Performance of Aluminium Alloy Sheets for Automobile Body Panels. 
Proc. of the SAE Conf. SP-1067, p. 191-202, 1995. 
/5/ | Fukumoto, H.; Ono, T.; Yoshida, M.: Formability and Panel Quality of Extra Deep Drawing Quality High 
Strength Steel Sheets. Proc. of the IDDRG 1994, p. 23-30. 
/6/ Daugherty, R.: Bending. Taking the guesswork out of material variations with closed loop feedback, Tooling 
and Production, Band 61, Heft 11, Seite 90-93, 1996. 
/7/  Boinski, F.: Auslegung von Ziehteilen und Preßwerkzeugen mit elementaren Methoden unter besonderer 
Berücksichtigung der Rückfederung. Dr.-Ing. Dissertation, Universität Hannover, 1996. 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B5. Amsterdam 2000. 297 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.