Hrabacek, Jan
In table 1 the basic statistics of the models can be found. The summ
there is the number of constraints specified b
considered as one entity,
Standard deviations used
60 = 1°.
ar
ary contains the real number of constraints. In brackets
y user, the difference is caused by the fact, that some constraints, however
are rewriten as a set of several constraints (3 for the parallelograms, 2 for the plane parallelism).
for weighting of the angle and the parallelism constraints are given in minutes (denoted ^), where
Figure 4: Zürich data set — used images
4.1 Models
Model #1
Figure 5 presents the result of the adjustment of the
were no constraints employed,
lacks regularity in the shape. B
occlusions of upper parts of th
one, could not be reconstructe
of normal equations.
geometrically weak data set, resulting in an irregular model. There
apart from coplanarity constraints that force the points in their planes. The result obviously
esides other facts presented in table 1, let us emphasise that only 4 images with significant
e building were used. The dormer windows, that distinguish this model from the second
d at all. The occlusions cause a lack of observations resulting in singularity of the system
Figure 5: Model #1 — no constraints
th
to
D
ne
R
re
ot
€x
va
CO
Model #2
Figure 6 shows the result of computation with the same data set as used for the
of geometrical object constraints. A summary of them is included in table 1
constraints is equal .27, convergency was reached within 11 iterations.
The constraint-based approach enables to obtain a complete model, des
with poor redundancy.
previous model, but with a strong support
. The mean standardised residual of the
A regularly shaped object model was obtained.
pite occlusions and despite image measurements
Figure 6: Model #2 — constraint support
va
In
va
PI
va
In
4.2 Advantages of the use of weighted constraints
4.2.1 Enhanced solution to occlussions
The possibility to reconstruct occluded parts of an object using only line
measurements has been described in (van de
n Heuvel, 1999). It presents also an analysis of the minimum image line
386 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B5. Amsterdam 2000.