ned
rent
rich
ters
t be
the
tive
ical
for
rge
ize,
Ses
> of
the
ive
rce
ind
des
of
ing
lon
ind
the
tal
ust
are
ect
1in
ral
he
Banchini, Giovanni
Draft emergency plans that cover the landscape at risk
Increase the information, training and education in land use at all community levels as the events of November
1994 and of May 1998 have indicated that both basic and technical environmental risk knowledge is low or non existent
Non structural interventions on the landscape do not entail modifications of the terrain. They do not aim to
decrease the probability of occurrence of a hazard and the ensuing damages but rather aim at increasing knowledge
about the potential disasters, developing reliable forecasting models and improving relationships with local residents.
These activities rely greatly on the availability of appropriate cartography starting with the delimitation of the risk areas
(zoning) which is fundamental for the planning of terrain modifications brought about by large scale industrial and
residential developments.
In general we can say that cartography helps in two ways, in the prevention and in the post event assistance
(including in this the most immediate steps after the event and those related to reconstruction and restoration)
In Italy, the Compagnia Generale Ripreseaeree (CGR) in its activity of documenting by aerial photography and
photogrammetry the catastrophic events of the last decades has identified a possible model of organizing the cognitive,
photogrammetric, topographic and cartographic activities relative to national environmental disasters. It does this by
means of digital color orthophotos and satellite positioning systems to locate and circumscribe real and potential
disaster areas thus aiding the development of forecasting models, a correct estimate of damages and a rational planning
of post event operations. The digital orthophoto as a metrical information tool for the preparation of risk maps is an
extremely versatile and concrete means for geographic monitoring and for coordinating disaster activities with a
dynamic component making it capable of being adjusted to all technological evolutions and land use variations.
THE DIGITAL COLOR ORTHOPHOTO
The orthophoto may be defined as cartography with a photographic base that maintains the planimetric
tolerances of the traditional maps at the same scale to which is or may be associated and an elevation content of
equivalent precision. The orthophoto is less costly and more rapidly available than the equivalent traditional map while
it integrates the principal characteristics of aerial photography (informational content) and of traditional maps (metric
content). The primary users are first of all those concerned with civil defense, environmental protection, land use
planning, public works, agriculture, cadaster, soil studies, geologic mapping, hydrology, archeology, etc..
For Italy the CGR is producing a color digital orthophoto coverage of the entire country at the nominal scale of
1:10 000 and ground resolution of 1m. It is the result of the differential rectification of aerial photography taken during
may-september 1998 with 150mm cameras at the relative altitude of 6000m. The images are digitized and
georeferenced in the National geodetic-cartographic system (Roma40- Gauss Boaga) with geometrical adjustments
made on the basis of a digital terrain model specifically made for the purpose.
The minimal module is made up of a section of the regional technical map at the scale of 1:10 000 and it is
fitted within the 1: 50 000 National cartography of the Istituto Geografico Militare (IGM), the official national
cartographic agency of the country, as a submultiple called a sezione, in analogy with the definitions of the Italian
Geodetic Commission
LAND INFORMATION FOR THE PREVENTION OF DISASTERS
From a practical point of view it is necessary to define the quantity and quality of the information instruments
needed for drafting hazards’ operational plans; in brief the landscape information needed by the civil defense
organizations. If we consider the needs of prevention, three different levels of land use information become apparent:
A first level cartographic system or a location level
A second level cartographic system or a working level
A third level cartographic system or a detail level
Although the documentation for the first two levels must be prepared for all areas defined as vulnerable, that
for the third level needs to be developed only where the morphologic characteristics of the terrain or the risk type
demand it. The first level of location requires tools to determine the general boundaries of the event and the detection of
the risk areas. It should also be possible to assess generally the structures and the infrastructures involved (roads,
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B7. Amsterdam 2000. 107