«0 uà ww m €)
Dees, Matthias
proportional to the area of the strata, provided that the sample size comprises the number of strata several times over.
The exact localisation of the samples during field work allows all sample points to be clearly assigned to stands.
These requirements are fulfilled in the forest inventories in the public forest enterprises. A further requirement is the
exact delineation of the forest stands. This can be done at little economic expense by registering the stand borders using
aerial photos (Duvenhorst & Niehaus-Übel, 1996). Figure 2 shows the mapping of forest stands carried out within the
framework of the study on the basis of CIR aerial photos.
3.2 Statistical methods
In the sample inventory estimates are needed for a large number of attributes. Statistically, they can be primarily
derived from estimates of sums, mean values, and ratios. The forest area is known in inventories of forest enterprises. If
the attributes are determined per area with reference to the single plot size and as quantities per ha, sums can be
determined from the product of the characteristics mean values and the overall area in ha. The following examples
should make this clear:
Attributes volume per ha (e.g. 250 m?/ha)
volume spruce per ha (e.g. 60 m*/ha)
area spruce per ha (eg. 0,12 ha/ha = 0,12)
Estimation of corresponding totals:
Volume = total area x mean[volume per ha]
Volume spruce - total area x mean[volume spruce per ha]
Species area = total Area x mean[area spruce per ha]
Estimation of corresponding ratios:
Volume spruce per area spruce = mean[volume spruce per ha] / mean[area spruce per ha]
Thus it is sufficient to derive estimators for means with the corresponding variances of the estimation of the mean and
to derive estimators for ratios with the
corresponding variances of the estimation of the
ratios. An alternative is to derive estimators for
totals and ratios instead of means and ratios as
described by e.g. Dees (1996), but since the
means and totals defined above differ only by
the factor of the known area, the two
approaches are equivalent.
The combination of a systematic grid with a
partition of the area into strata can be viewed
approximately as an independent systematic
sampling within each strata. The estimation of
overall estimates is based on the estimation of
means, variances and covariances inside the
strata. The estimation inside the strata is done
assuming simple random sampling inside the
strata. Thus the resulting variances will
overestimate the true values resulting in
conservative estimates of the errors and derived
confidence statements.
To evaluate the benefits of a stratified estimate,
an estimate is calculated without stratification.
These estimates are calculated using estimators
for simple random sampling, again resulting in
conservative estimates of the errors. This is
common practice in forest inventories in order
to be on the safe side. Since the finite 7 p. : 4
population correction can be neglected in forest ) À
inventories for forest enterprises, the following
estimators do not include a finite population
correction.
Figure 2. Registering of the stand borders based on aerial CIR photos
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B7. Amsterdam 2000. 357