ic factors 
)km wide 
| methods 
tors. The 
landslide 
yographic 
\R (ERS- 
ollowing, 
| requires 
and mass 
st digital 
lizations, 
1. 2). For 
ical map 
and faults 
0). In the 
ese shear 
servations 
1solidated 
1 tectonic 
sed factor 
nalysis of 
id by the 
including 
d precise 
rts of the 
rofile A). 
nation led 
sses were 
wnstream 
ss-section 
ined from 
maximum 
identified 
terized by 
f a spatial 
r effective 
ity due to 
cessing of 
vering the 
ult a state 
ute height 
rol points 
ainty was 
is caused 
ed spatial 
Roessner, Sigrid 
  
2000 m 
  
1500 m 
  
   
   
    
  
    
1000 m. 
Kashgarta 
landslide 
Status 1998 
Profile 
  
1600 m 
1560 m 
Profile (&) 
1520m: e 
0 200 m 400 m 1420 m 
   
slope classification (6 classes) 1380 m. 
    
   
  
PG4- N. msg 
0 200 m 
Profile (© 
  
      
  
4 slope classes 
0? . 4? 
B^. 9» 
10° - 14° 
15° - 19° 
20° - 24° 
25° - 34° 
  
  
  
  
  
Fig. 2 GIS-based analysis of Kashgarta landslide using MOMS-2P stereo products and geological information 
Stereo image matching for the Maili-Suu test area was performed for each pixel allowing the interpolation of a DEM 
with a 25m raster size forming the basis for orthoimage generation. A GIS-based analysis of these stereo products in 
combination with geological information show their great potential for investigating structural settings as a major 
factor in landslide initiation. In this connection, derivation of quantitative relief parameters, perspective visualizations 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B7. Amsterdam 2000. 1265