ISPRS Commission III, Vol.34, Part 3A »Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002
— The length/width rate is smaller than a certain value,
determined by the longest building
— The standard deviation of laplacian values are within a
certain range for buildings
Segments exceeding 6000m° usually represent field or branched
street areas. The length/width criterion excludes long narrow
segments, as they are to be found on grassland and streets. The
standard deviation of the laplacian values of the segments is
small for flat areas and high for undulating regions. To apply
the laplacian value of a segment as a classification criterion
works only with a good segmentation result. The building has to
be entirely within a segment and the segment should not be too
long-ranged around the building.
Urban areas subject to different conditions. Thus, the
classification parameters have to be altered to:
— Buildings are not to be found within forest or water
areas
— Buildings do not have higher neighbour objects than
buildings itself, except they are situated on a slope —
thus the relative border to higher neighbours in the
laser scanner data segments should not exceed a
certain value
— Building segments are smaller than 6000m?
— The length/width rate is smaller than a certain value,
determined by the longest building
— The standard deviation of laplacian values are within a
certain range for buildings
Similar conditions can be suggested for flat, rural regions. In
general, the detection algorithm is more complex for urban
areas since the variation of house types is bigger — big flat
roofed buildings of light industry units and small steep roofed
houses in residential areas. Specific shape attributes such as
number of arcs were not used since the shape of house-
containing segments is not consistent (e.g. to buildings attached
trees).
The whole processing chain was optimised to detect as many
buildings as possible. 2™ order errors were accepted as a
problem to be solved in the following steps of classification and
building model generation. Hence, the percentage of 2" order
errors is relatively large. The number of segments, which are
wrongly classified as house-containing (second order errors), is
much higher for the rural area than for the urban region. Table
4-2 contains the statistical figures. The reasons are the general
characteristics of the locality such as vegetation and height
differences. Since the detection mainly bases on the degree of
the variation in height (laplacian values), urban areas are
segmented more clearly. That means, in dense city areas, that
the height differences between buildings and their surrounding
is bigger as in rural areas. Especially commercial units: they
usually do not have high vegetation areas at all — thus, the
segments limit the buildings precisely.
Classified correctly 2°“ order errors
Rural area 770 (94%) 1960 (340%)
Urban area 1553 (95%) 1114 (170%)
Table 4-2. Statistic of purely on height information based
house segment classification
The exceptional high number of second order errors of the rural
region can be easily reduced by an analysis of the local standard
deviation of the height information and the gradient values.
About 40% of the 1960 second order errors could be
eliminated.
Finally, the centre coordinates of the segments selected as
houses in the house-segment-file are compared with those
already recorded in the look-up table. If the coordinates differ
by more than four metres from each other, the new ones are
added. Segments wrongly classified as house-containing are
nonetheless included in the house positioning and modelling
process. Whether there is a house or not, is checked by the point
distribution. The position and the new outline of the recognised
building shall then be saved in a new vector file. It is also
planned to create a model of each house.
In both building detection procedures, it is important, that no
segment, which might contain a building, is eliminated. Each
centre coordinate in the look-up table is assigned a percentage
expressing the likelihood of containing a house.
With this method of detecting buildings, very good detecting
quotes were achieved. In the urban area 99% and in the rural
area 99.5% of the in 2001 existing buildings were detected.
5 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the procedures described in the former chapters, 99%
of the buildings in the study area could be detected in the laser
scanner data. The pixel map proved to provide a good trigger
for the detection of buildings in the laser scanner data and it
also decreased the processing time. In addition, a number of
buildings, which were not present on the map, could be detected
purely on the basis of the laser scanner data. Due to planimetric
discrepancies of up to 12 metres, which were detected between
the map and the laser scanner data set, the final segmentation
was performed purely on the basis of the laser scanner data,
without the contribution of the map. The ortho photo was solely
used for visualization and verification purposes. The problem of
identifying segments, which do not contain houses, has to be
addressed in future work on building model generation.
The use of eCognition proved to be rather beneficial in the
detection and segmentation procedure as well as in the
characterization of the segments used for classification. It has to
be mentioned, however, that the current version of eCognition
is rather slow in some operations, and that larger regions have
to be subdivided into small tiles for successful operation.
6 FURTHER RESEARCH
Future work should first concentrate on the optimisation of the
segmentation and detection procedures in eCognition and
ArcView. Furthermore, methods for processing very large data
sets have to be developed. Tests with more data sets from
different sensors and in different regions have to be performed
to prove the applicability of the developed processing schemes.
Raw unfiltered first and last pulse data, preferably in
combination with laser scanner intensity values, should be used
as input into the detection and segmentation procedure.
Building modelling will be a major point of future research. A
discussion of suitable data formats for storing 3-D building
model information in a topographic landscape model and
techniques for transferring these models into maps and other
visualization tools will follow.
A - 173