ISPRS Commission III, Vol.34, Part 3A „Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002
factors b= C,/C, can always be treated as a constant.
According to our tests, in the majority of cases, the deviation of
b from the mean value did not exceed 1 percent over the whole
overlap area between two different interferograms.
In order to obtain the absolute glacier velocity, the integration
of velocity gradients in the output GINSAR product has yet to
be performed. The absolute glacier velocity can be found by
performing the line integral of its partial gradients V V_and VY,
Vs y)e VY (by) VY. (y).
V(x.y)- VV(x.1)* 37 VV, (x. 7) (14)
with the subsequent or preliminary linear (line by line) high-
pass filtering and averaging of results obtained in the azimuth
and range directions as offered in (Scambos & Fahnestock,
1998). Another interesting approach to the integration of
velocity gradients is based on the adaptation of available
algorithms for one- or two-dimensional phase unwrapping, but
this method has not been tried yet.
An alternative local solution that we found useful in our study is
to solve an over-determined system of linear equations in the
form of
| - v 2 Ax with v! v 2 min (15)
is the vector of
observations V V. and VE with the dimension of 2(n 1} „V
in a least-squares manner. In (14), /
is the vector of residuals, 4 is the design matrix and x is the
vector of unknowns. The total number of unknowns is equal to
the number of pixels y = n°.
In our case, the generally large matrix of normal equations
N = A" 4 is sparse and banded with a bandwidth of . In order
to solve such a matrix, we apply the modification of the
Cholesky algorithm offered in (Schuh 1998). The number of
operations is then reduced to 0.5. n* - 3? 4 0.5. n? & 5n.
As we have only relative measurements between two pixel
values, the equation system has a rank of 4; — 1, which means
that one more independent measurement, e.g. one reference
point with known (zero) velocity, is still necessary.
3.3 Algorithmic Singularities
It is worth noting that the basic equation (5) becomes invalid if
the module of the phase difference between two neighbouring
pixels in azimuth or/and in range direction exceeds z. In the
interferential picture, such locations called singularities are
related either with the phase noise or with steep topography and
/ or highly accelerated motion.
Apart from the phase noise influence, the module of the partial
phase gradient will exceed z , if the terrestrial slope exceeds the
critical value £,, , which can be determined from the following
er?
dé AB, -Ap
equation
The graph in Figure 3 shows, however, that depending on the
length of the normal baseline and look angle (theta) the value of
A - 328
critical slope is usually not smaller than 50?. Such inclinations
might be excluded from consideration.
critical slope [deg]
o N
© o
A
o
30 |
1 50 100 150 200 250 300 |
baseline length [m]
Theta = 20 deg Theta = 23 deg Theta = 26 deg
Figure 3. Critical slope versus normal baseline (ERS-1/2-SAR)
In areas of high deformation along glacier walls and at glacier
fronts with numerous crevasses and non-uniform motion of ice
blocks, the motion phase gradient can also exceed z, if the
velocity gradient between two neighbouring pixels is larger than
0.25), Le.
AV, =V
ew =V,u—V,22/4=1415[cm/day]. (17)
Other kinds of singularities in the form of narrow “traces” from
the edges of interferometric fringes can also be seen in
topograms. Such singularities are compensated by locally
adding or subtracting a value of 27 to / from the topogram as
follows
—], if VQ,, ZN
Vo, =Vo., +27 -n: n= 0, if—z <Vo,, «m. (18)
+1, VO, SL
A flow chart showing the sequence of principal stages of the
GINSAR technique is given in Figure 4. The GINSAR
algorithm has been implemented in the new RSG 4.0
software package distributed by Joanneum Research.
4. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION AND FIELD
VALIDATION
The efficacy and robustness of our new algorithms have been
verified by several independent experts who processed
multitemporal (D)INSAR data using the GINSAR technique.
Up to now, 27 GINSAR models have been processed and all
results were quite satisfactory. The time required for processing
one differential model did not exceed 4 hours. Visual analysis
confirmed the fine detail of GINSAR products and revealed that
the original ground resolution of INSAR data has been nearly
preserved.
The INSAR velocities of glaciers were measured several times
using different interferograms and the results appeared quite
consistent. The relative tachometric accuracy was verified by
comparing the velocities of 7 test glaciers measured by
conventional DINSAR and our alternative techniques. The
mean difference between the velocities was estimated at +6.3