ISPRS Commission II, Vol.34, Part 3A „Photogrammetric Computer Vision“, Graz, 2002
cm/day, and the maximum difference reached 58%. The r.m.s.
difference was given as 6.34 cm/day. We understood that such a
comparison could not serve as an estimate of absolute accuracy,
but indicated only methodological differences.
(7 —- (C 7m»,
complex- complex-
valued SAR valued SAR
— À
|4 interferogram I> interferogram
generation generation
M rr V
spectral filtering spectral filtering
(optionally) (optionally)
topogram topogram
generation generation
V. V.
fluxogram co-registration
generation and subtraction
c.VV.. VF. transferential
e dq ? referencing €
velogram referencing, €
generation geocoding
Figure 4. Principal flowchart of the GINSAR technique
Absolute tachometric validations were performed during the
field work undertaken in Novaya Zemlya in September 2001,
when the frontal velocities of several test tidewater glaciers
were surveyed using precise geodetic equipment. Preliminary
measurements of the maximum velocities were made in the lab
using 4 INSAR models taken over the same glaciers in March
1996. The geodetic surveys were performed using two
alternative techniques. A conventional geodetic technique of
forward intersection is based on multitemporal observations of
identical points at the glacier front from two different positions
with a known baseline. The polar idea of a non-traditional
”touch-and-go” technique is to install the laser line in a
tangential position at a predefined distance from the glacier
front and to frequently measure the distance to any point on the
opposite coast in order to record the instant when the glacier
will cross the laser line and the measured distance will change
abruptly (Sharov et al., 2001). This technique made use of a
LDI-3 laser rangefinder (range up to 19 km without retro-
reflector) mounted on a Leica T1602 theodolite (angular
accuracy 0.5 mgon). Typical results of velocity measurements
are given in Table 1.
The results obtained indicate that the winter INSAR velocities
are somewhat lower than those from 'summer' geodetic surveys,
which corresponds to the observations performed by other
investigators in other regions (e.g. Rabus & Fatland 2000).
Apart from the different duration of observations and seasonal
changes in the glacier motion, this fact can be explained by the
inherent influence of INSAR undersampling if velocity
gradients between neighbouring pixels exceed 0.014 m/day. In
spite of the revealed tachometric differences of up to 4096 and
more, the spatial correlation between the GINSAR velocities
and those surveyed in the field was quite high over all glaciers.
; Frontal velocity [m/day]
Glacier : :
INSAR | Fwd. intersection | Touch-and-go
Rykatchova
No. 88 0.56 0,68+0,14 0,83+0,20
Mack No.91 0.37 0,61+0,13 0,73+0,15
Table 1. Glacier velocities measured in the lab and in the field
S. CONCLUSIONS
The global and stringent GINSAR algorithm devised for the
glacier motion estimation does not involve complex process
artifices and does not require additional topographic reference
models thus eliminating areal error propagation, and the
resultant velocity gradient values are quite tolerant of local
phase errors. Therefore, such an approach remains feasible
even under significant phase noise. The stage of phase filtering,
which is usually included in all known phase unwrapping
algorithms, becomes optional in our case and is used mostly for
cosmetic reasons. The high metric quality, detail and
complementary thematic contents of the GINSAR products,
which are called topogram and fluxogram, show the expedience
of this technique and its applicability to solving various tasks in
the area of unsupervised glacier change detection and glacier
mass balance measurement. The transferential approach based
on the analysis of fast-ice motion forced by the glacier flow
provides good reference values for the glacier frontal velocity
and velocity gradients and can be considered as a
complementary operation to the GINSAR method. The
combination of our algorithms provides a unique opportunity to
reduce the computational load and to mitigate some problems
related to the operation of interferometric phase unwrapping.
References
Bamler, R., Hartl, P., 1998. Synthetic apertur radar interferometry.
Inverse Problems, 14, R1-R54.
Fatland, D., Lingle, G., 1998. Analysis of the 1993-95 Bering
Glacier surge using differential SAR interferometry. J.Glac., 44
(148), pp. 532-545.
Forster, R. et al, 1999. Interferometric radar observations of
Glaciares Europa and Penguin. J. Glac., 45 (150), pp. 325-336.
Gabriel, A. et al., 1989. Mapping small elevation changes over
large areas: differential radar interferometry. J. Geophys.Res., 94,
B7, pp. 9183-9191.
Joughin, I. et al, 1996. Estimation of ice-sheet motion using
satellite radar interferometry. J.Glac., 42 (142), pp. 564-575.
Meyer, F., Hellwich, O., 2001. Estimation of Glacier Topography
and Velocity Using Correlation Minimization.
Proc. of DGPF Jahrestagung Sept. 2001, Konstanz, pp. 467-474
Rabus, B.T. Fatland, D.R., 2000. Comparison of SAR-
interferometric and surveyed velocities on a mountain glacier:
Black Rapids Glacier. J. G/ac., 46 (152), pp. 119-128.
Sandwell, D., Price, E., 1998. Phase gradient approach to stacking
interferograms. J. Geophys. Res., 103, No. B12, 30183-30204.
Scambos T., Fahnestock, M., 1998. Improving DEMs over ice
sheets using AVHRR photoclinometry J.Glac., 44(146), pp.97-103.
Sharov, A.L., Gutjahr K., 2002. Some methodological enhancements
to INSAR surveying of polar ice caps. In: Observing our
environment from space. Proc. of the 21* EARSeL Symp, pp.65-72.
Sharov, A.I. et al., 2001. Results of the field campaign in Barents
and Kara seas on board the Hydrologist ship. In: Annual scientific
report to the INCO Commission, P 9, pp.1-20.
Wegmüller U., Strozzi T., 1998. Characterization of differential
interferometry approaches. In: Proc. EUSAR’98, Berlin, p.237-240.
A - 329