IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002
SUGAR BEET YIELD PREDICTION USING ERS SAR DATA {PRIVATE }
S.P. Vyas'", M.D. Steven! , K.W. Jaggard? and R. Werker
1. Department of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD
E-mail: Michael.Steven ? geography.nottingham.ac.uk Tel. +44 115 9515442 Fax. +44 115 9515249
2. IACR Brooms Barn, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP28 6NP
, E-mail: Keith Jaggard@bbsrc.ac.uk Tel. +44 1284 812216 Fax. +44 1284 811191
1*. Presently at CMD/ARG/RESA, Space Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmedabad - 380 015
Email: sp vyasQ yahoo.com Tel: 00 91 79 675 4037 Fax: 00 91 79 674 8813/676 2735
KEY WORDS: ERS SAR, water cloud model, LAI, canopy cover, SPOT
ABSTRACT :
Radar remote sensing systems can penetrate cloud and provide regular data for persistently cloudy periods. In sugar beet, previous
studies have shown that forecasts of potential sugar yield can be provided through the growing season, based on satellite
observations of crop canopy cover at various stages of development. These observations are used in conjunction with corresponding
regional weather information, crop sowing dates and soil types to provide successively refined yield forecasts as harvest time
approaches. Field data were collected from June to August in 1995 and 1996 covering a study area around the IACR-Broom's Barn
sugar beet research institute (UK). An independently fitted version of the water cloud model was inverted to calculate Leaf Area
Index (LAI) from values of ERS-1 and ERS-2 SAR backscatter and estimates of soil moisture content. LAI estimates were in good
agreement with measured values. Canopy cover was then estimated from the radar-estimated LAI values, using a standard
exponential relationship that has a well established coefficient for sugar beet. Good correlation was found between observed and
SAR predicted yield. The study shows that radar data can provide useful estimates of canopy cover for crop production modelling,
especially in areas where optical data is difficult to obtain because of cloud.
1. INTRODUCTION
Radar data are not as well established for monitoring vegetation
as optical data. However, the prime interaction of microwave
radiation with the surface environment is with water. Leaves
are essentially water-containing structures suspended above the
soil surface and strongly affect radar backscatter. The volume
of water in the canopy and the degree of backscattering depend
primarily on the LAI In crops such as sugar beet, this
parameter has well established relationships with the fraction f
of photosynthetically active solar radiation intercepted and
absorbed by leaves in the crop canopy. Sugar beet yield
estimation using satellite data employs estimates of this
fraction because it is directly proportional to the rate of
biomass production by the canopy (Steven et al., 1986). The
integral f and irradiance intercepted solar radiation, projected
forward to harvest, corresponds to the seasonal biomass
production of the crop.
Compared with optical remote sensing, radar has a more
ambiguous relationship with crop canopy variables, but the
relationship with leaf area in sugar beet is significant and
strong enough to provide reasonable estimates of crop cover
(Xu et al., 1996). However, the radar model used by Xu ef al.
(1996) was calibrated and fitted to agronomic field data from a
single date in 1994. This paper describes an independant study
to evaluate the reliability of radar estimates of crop cover in
sugar beet.
2. AIMS
The specific objectives were as follows:
1. To determine the relationship of radar backscatter, measured
by ERS-1 and ERS-2 SAR, with LAI and soil moisture.
2. To validate this relationship on an independent data set.
3. To apply crop canopy cover indices derived from ERS SAR
in yield prediction model.
4. To compare the accuracies of yield estimates derived using
optical and SAR data
To test the robustness of this model over time, ERS-1 and ERS-
2 SAR data were related to ground measurements of sugar beet
for a sequence of dates through the growing season. This was
then used to estimate crop cover (f) for incorporation into the
sugar beet growth model.
3. DATA SOURCES
'
3.1 Ground truth data
The study area was chosen near IACR-Broom's Barn in
Suffolk, UK (52? 16'N, 0? 35'E). The data were collected
during the period from June to August, 1995 on ERS-1
overpass dates, whereas in 1996 data were collected weekly
from June to August. A Parkinson radiometer (P P Systems,
Stotford, Beds, UK) with wavebands 2 bands (NIR and Red
respectively at 650 and 850nm) and 2 heads (radiance for 30?
FOV and irradiance) was used for radiometric measurements
of the crop canopy. This served as a ground reference to the
satellite data. In four fields, 5 areas each about minimum 12 m
apart, were used to collect samples and biophysical
measurements as described by Xu et al. (1996). A larger set of
sugar beet fields was identified for the extension of image
analysis.
32 ERS-1 and ERS-2 SAR data
pd ppd ON P9 pd
PN pede, A KA
—_ eet A AN