f various
rshy area
ding
sased
place
relate to
ancement
moothing
filter was
] value of
els in the
ogeneous
f natural
angroves.
vith false
o the real
longitude
eet. This
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, "Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India, 2002
method of mapping mangroves was the simplest and gave very
good approximation and a fair assessment of the mangrove
ecosystem in the study area.IRS -IB has inherent limitation of
its spatial resolution for identification of individual tree species.
However cover type (tree species and density) mapping of
mangrove vegetation could be possible with IRS data. .An
example of such an attempt is the digital analysis of IRS data
was done to determine the accuracy with which Rhizophora and
Avicennia, the two important species found in the study area,
could be identified. ^ Both supervised and unsupervised
signature extraction techniques were used. Unsupervised
clustering gave certain recognition maps and these when
compared with ground information was found to be quite
correct depicting the type of vegetation zonation. This was
very clearly depicted in the study conducted over a testsite in
Bhairavavanipalem, an area just to the South of the study area.
Attempts were made delineate to more clearly different
species, the rationing technique was used. A ratio map
produced with ratio of bands 3 and 4.Recent studies conclude
that the spectral merge of IRS - IC PAN data with LISS-II
multispectral data of IRS-1B allows better discrimination of
mangrove forest categories. An attempt has been made to
determine the accuracy with which different species (sub
categories) in the Rhizophora and Avicennia, could be
identified. It was observed that due to spectral merging of IRS-
IC (spatial resolution is 5.9 m) with IRS-1B LISS-II(spatial
resolution is 36.25 m), it is possible to identify different
species at pixel level. Unsupervised clustering gave certain
recognition maps and these when compared with ground
information (extensive ground truth is carried out) were found
to be quite correctly depicting the type of vegetation zonation.
This test was also carried out over a testsite near
Bhairavavanipalem, an area just to the south of the study area.
& Digitol (sup *
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
[82 00"E T IT xx 027 30°8 1700'N
| 8245 E Cite
SUGGESTED OPTIMUM LANDUSE % MAP
T5 10 7175 km,
TEE ar
{ t
2
|
|
|
|
E.
|
|
|
en i er
3 . LEGEND
} >
i
; CROP M
Co : LAMD MITM «e
e i j
1 T
P e h
- F |
ji | 36 30'N
1630 N
2.7 GIS Modeling
The various parameters obtained from Remote sensing and the
other collateral data sources were integrated to develop an
integrated optimum landuse plan using GIS. The various
thematic maps like soils, geomorphology , slope,
landuse/landcover were overlaid with each other digitally by
assigning appropriate weightages to arrive optimum landuse
plan.
3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The IRS -1B ,LISS II Imagery dated March,1995 is used for the
preparation of landuse/landcover maps on 1:50,000 scale
corresponding to Survey of India toposheets 65L/1,L/2,L/5 and
L/6, the landuse/landcover maps are interpreted visually by
following the legend prescribed by Department of space under
National mission programme. Sequential nature of IRS data
provide opportunity to monitor changes in the landuse activities
in the mangroves.
For a comparative analysis and change detection , the current
landuse information with past .As such interpretation of data for
the period February 1994 is carried out. It was observed that
during a span of one year period , the spread of aquaculture has
caused destruction of mangrove upto 22.69 Ha. per annum in
area particularly in the I Polavaram mandal Region. This
would have definite impact on the ecology of the area.
It was observed that due to pressure of population , settlements
have been established by clearing mangroves. Increasing use of
pesticides, industrial pollution near by study area, the
ecosystem has been changed completely. Many areas under
forests were found have been converted into fishponds and salt
beds. The corresponding map depicting changes was produced
in the study.
Table-3.1. . Shows the action items prepared from of optimum
landuse plan. (Figure 2.4)
Potential Area for
Suggested optimal + Priority for
Land Resource
landuse development
Development
Cropland in Kharif/ Rabi season
Intensive agriculture High priority
Agro-horticulture
Mangroves
Regeneration, protection High priority
and
conservation of man-
groves as a
biosphere and
wildlife
reserve.
Sandy area
Development of shelterbelts High priority
of
plantations to protect
from
sea erosion.
417