IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, *Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India,2002
from the production of different crops takes into account all
input costs such. as seeds, fingerlings, fertilizers, labor and
water. The economic assessment model also takes into account
input and output prices and costs and returns from intermediate
products such as shrimp fry production. In the economic model
the indicators are specified in Table 1.
Social impact assessment model: The social indicators used in
this study are specified in Table 1. The “relative importance" of
different regimes corresponding to a particular indicator was
determined by pair-wise comparison. The methodology used is
the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is described as
a “theory of measurement” developed around Saaty’s
eigenvector method for determining priorities through pair-wise
comparison. The corresponding computer package used was
Expert Choice. The social indicators are calculated as the sum
of depending variables multiplied by respective relative
importance. Detailed calculations are shown in EGIS (2001a).
Environmental impact assessment model: The environmental
indicators are specified in Table 1. The relative importance of
different regimes corresponding to a particular economic
indicator was also determined by pair-wise comparison as
described above. Detailed calculations are shown in EGIS
(2001a).
River / Beel
Boro rice crop
Mixed winter crop
£2 Fallow bare land
Fallow with stubble and grass
Wetland grass
Other
Bagda shrimp farms
Settlement/Homestead veg.
Sundarbans Mangrove forest
land use map
BE Bagda shrimp farm
BE River /Beel
Aman rice crop
35 Other Crops / Veg.
Settlements
Sundarbans Mangrove forest
Golda shrimp farm
Bagda / Aman
Bagda / Bagda
Aman rice
Galda shrimn
Boro rice
Mixed Crop
Other vegetation
Settlement
Mangrove
River / Beel
4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The DSS presents the problems and landuse conflicts of the
study area in a simple form for managers, planners and decision
makers. The users can formulate their own objectives and select
the criteria, which would help fulfill the objectives. They are
provided with an interactive tool to select landuse strategies and
scenarios to form cases for analysis and compare their
environmental and the socio-economic impacts without being
stalled by their complex interrelationships. The DSS brings
together information from a large number of different sources.
Remote sensing data has been instrumental as there is no other
source that gives spatial distribution of landuse. The
development of direct and indirect linkages between
information and decision support gives a more scientific basis
to an otherwise economically and socio-politically driven
decision-making process.
Within the computational framework, land suitability model for
different landuse types may be integrated so that landuse
allocations are more realistic. Addition of a multi criteria
evaluation tool would greatly enhance the decision support
capability of the DSS as currently it presents a score-card for
comparison and evaluation of strategies.
5 REFERENCES
CPD, 1999, Environmental Consequences of Structural
Adjustment: Towards Sustainable Shrimp Culture in
Bangladesh, Paper 2., Center for Policy Dialogue, Dhaka,
Bangladesh.
EGIS, 2001a. Integrated Environmental Management: A case
study on landuse strategies in the southwest of Bangladesh,
(Technical Note-19), Environment and GIS Support Project for
Water Sector Planning, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
EGIS, 2001b. Development of Decision Support Systems,
(Technical Note-20), Environment and GIS Support Project for
Water Sector Planning, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
EGIS & SPARRSO, 2001. Applications of ERS-2 images in
monitoring water and landuses, Environment and GIS Support
Project for Water Sector Planning (EGIS) and Space Research
and Remote Sensing Organization (SPARRSO) joint report,
Dhaka, Bangladesh.
FFYP, 1997, The Fifth Five Year Plan 1997-2002, Planning
Commission, Government of Bangladesh.
Rijsberman, F.R and Koudstaal, R. 1989. Development and
application of a framework for analysis for integrated coastal
resources management in an international context. In. Magoon
OT (ed), Coastal Zone 1989. ASCE, New York.
6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The DSS was prepared by EGIS in collaboration with Resource
Analysis (RA) of the Netherlands. It is a part of EGIS endeavor
in capacity development for Integrated Environmental
Management.
558