Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring (A)

the total 
orest type of 
and Tropical 
asslands. The 
nbining both 
) sq. km, i.e., 
> district. 
; with various 
S, in which 
lands having 
d wastelands. 
'e forestlands 
percent of the 
to an area of 
lite image in 
eas including 
39.14 sq. km. 
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, "Resource and Environmental Monitoring", Hyderabad, India,2002 
  
Figure-3: Land Use and Land Cover map 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
CLASS NAME AREA (Sq. Km) 
Dense forest > 0.6 957.03 
Dense forest 0.4 —0.6 608.07 
Open forest 0.2-0.4 985.65 
Crop land 595.10 
Degraded forest 0.1 —0.2 1276.59 
Scrubs « 0.1 416.84 
Upland agriculture 725.13 
Bauxite area I 49.15 
Bauxite area II 25.99 
Crop land 1526.72 
Fallow Land 3723.09 
Settlements 107.80 
Sandy area 39.14 
Water bodies 124.69 
Total 11160.96 
  
  
  
  
TABLE - 1: LAND USE/ LAND COVER CATEGORY 
4. CONCLUSION 
The present study highlights the fact that digital image 
processing and hybrid classification techniques are useful for 
showing broad categories of land use/ land cover classes. This 
provides an accurate basic information of land use/ land cover 
of Visakhapatanam district. Optimum exploitation of natural 
resources without causing deterioration in its value or quality is 
the main criteria to achieve sustainable development of the area 
under study. But the increase in population both human and 
livestock is alarming and needs to be tackled by a holistic 
approach for sustainable development to achieve self-reliance in 
terms of meeting the demands of food, fodder, fuel wood and 
water requirement. The only way is to integrate all the 
information pertaining to an area and to find out ways to 
tackle/control the land degradation, soil erosion, deforestation 
etc and create awareness on ecological conservation and 
preservation of natural resources on a sustained basis. Some of 
the management practices can be implemented for sustainable 
development of the district. 
ACKNOWGEMENTS 
The Authors are grateful to Dr. Manju G, RRSSC, 
Kharagpur, India for his kind co-operation during this work. 
REFERENCES 
Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Madhavan U.N.V., 1986. Application of 
remote sensing techniques in forest cover monitoring and habitat 
evaluation. A case study in Kaziranga National Park, Assam. 
Proceedings of Seminar-cum- workshop on Wildlife Habitat 
Evaluation Using Remote Sensing Techniques, Dehradun, pp.238- 
247. 
NRSA, 1992. Mannuals of land use/ land cover mapping, NRSA, 
Hyderabad, India, Vol. 1&2 
Rao, D.P., Gautam, R.L., Karale and Sahai, B., 1991. IRS 1A 
application for land use/ land cover mapping in India. Current 
Science, 61 (3&4), pp. 153-160 
Rao, U.R., 1990. Space technology and forest management with 
specific relevance to developing nations. In Proceedings of the 41% 
IAF congress, Dresden, Germany, pp. 1-10. 
Sudhakar, S., Krishana, N., Ramana, I. V., Pal, D. K., Das, R. K. 
and Raha, A. K., 1992. Forest cover mapping using IRS-1A LISS 
II data. Asian-Pacific Remote Sensing Journal, 4(2) pp. 25-30. 
583 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.