f Patna and
ment study
mbai using
nt study of
ote sensing
t along the
INPT, New
/s. National
nt study of
ing remote
Limited.
1, Director,
|" Dr. 7A)
plications),
agement in
cientists of
port during
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS DERIVED
FROM OPTICAL SATELLITE DATA FOR TERRAIN EVOLUTION STUDIES
Ian Dowman
Department of Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street,
London WCIE 6BT, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7679 7226, Fax: +44 20 7380 0453, email: idowman @ ge.ucl.ac.uk
KEYWORDS: Earthquakes, DEM/DTM, Correlation, Fusion, Accuracy
ABSTRACT :
Digital elevation models (DEMs) have been generated from satellite data for many years now, and techniques for automatic
generation of DEMs have evolved as scientists have gained a better understanding of the techniques, and the new demands placed by
high resolution data. The establishment of a Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes and Tectonics (COMET) in
UK has led to an assessment of whether current techniques are producing the best DEMS for specific applications, and in particular
to analyse the detail of the terrain to study landscape evolution. Digital elevation models are vital to this study. This paper analyses
current methods of matching optical images for DEM generation and asks the question: how can the quality of DEMs be improved?
It can be concluded that there are three main directions which research could take:
e Improved stereomatching, including use of new techniques such as wavelet transformations, the use of breaklines and the
use of new strategies that recognise terrain slope and land cover.
e Improved representation of the terrain through selection of grid size and method of interpolation.
e Data fusion techniques that exploit synergy and remove blunders.
This paper will review current techniques and propose a number of methods that will produce DEMs of the quality required for the
study of terrain evolution.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As more and more sources of digital elevation models
(DEMs) are available, and the range of applications
increases, so there is an inevitable demand for the quality of
the DEMs to improve. What is meant by quality, however,
is very much subject to the perspective of the user. The
requirements of a DEM for producing orthoimages are very
different from those for terrain analysis, or for extracting
buildings in urban areas. The concept of accuracy is
similarly subjective, and might refer to absolute elevation
accuracy of a point, or to the definition of micro relief or
building edges. Accuracy is also linked to 'scale' and to the
spacing between points.
The representation of the data is also a crucial issue, as is
the transformation that has taken place between the original
measurements and the representation. A surface could be
exactly represented by a set of accurate measurements with
infinitely small spacing between those. As the spacing is
increased so the accuracy of the representation will
deteriorate.
Stereomatching is now generally used to generate DEMs.
There are many techniques used in stereomatching. The
basic categories of area based matching and feature based
matching can themselves be broken down to include the
method of correlation, the strategies used, use of break lines
eic. All of these have particular advantages and
disadvantages and the user should be aware of these and be
able to choose the best techniques for his or her application.
For the study of terrain evolution, the use of break lines are
particularly important, and the definition of micro relief.
The detail available from the matching may be lost if
unsuitable storage schemes and interpolation techniques are
used. It is necessary to select the most suitable. Finally, DEMs
can be improved by synergistic use of two or more DEMs with
different characteristics. Interferometric SAR and optical data can
both produce good DEMs, but are complementary, and the best
characteristics of each can be used to improve the final result.
An understanding of these factors may, in itself, contribute to
improve the quality of the DEM. Improvement of the accuracy of
the measurements will also be a factor:
This paper will limit itself to discussing DEMs derived from
optical images obtained from Earth observation satellites for the
purpose of terrain analysis. The paper will first present the
COMET project and then set out the factors which could improve
the DEM. The more promising of these will then be analysed and
conclusions reached on which research directions to follow.
2.0 THE COMET PROJECT
A Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes and
Tectonics (COMET) has been established between the Universities
of Oxford, Cambridge and University College London in UK. The
overall objective of COMET is to use the complete range of Earth
Observation techniques that pertain to the measurement of crustal
deformation, and to use these to determine the accumulation and
release of crustal strain, and to reveal the effects of past
earthquakes and faulting. Together with theoretical analysis, these
measurements will be used to study the earthquake cycle, the
response of the Earth’s surface to faulting and uplift, and the
physics of continental deformation. All of these areas of research
have a direct bearing on the quantification of seismic hazard and
interpretation of past environments controlling the distribution of
natural resources. The primary Earth Observation techniques that
will be used to start with are InSAR, GPS and Satellite
Photogrammetry.
617