id 25947 
H7 t/year 
"fodder 
is given 
1 fodder 
| 
  
  
kini 
Total 
53509 
18650 
7297 
22125 
6575 
65397 
26380 
15932 
16839 
4384 
20868 
5679 
263635 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
| 
  
  
"deficit 
tershed. 
f fodder 
1sidered 
optimal 
jlity as 
m truth 
which is 
ver, the 
nal) and 
id non- 
iges, 92 
level of 
red 169 
iges fall 
optimal 
'y even 
villages 
cent at 
raction. 
| 75 per 
jolem in 
certain 
nal and 
/ deficit 
| fig. 2 
61 
65 
IAPRS & SIS, Vol 
34, Part 7. “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India.2002 
  
  
  
irc imm + 4 T i din iin i 
of = A oem il 
: - s $URPLUS VILLAGES i 
+ ug i 
e i r Là "7" && i *%) il 
P ; i a T i 
15g, "Or" BETENMLE Land e i 
i i 
Ti £1 . FEW il 
(7 Té - tu D 1%) i 
DEFICIT VILLAGES ii 
j E] + 25 15] | 
: B ^ $0 (5) i 
\ aim 
i (UU, T». 
B RIVER | 
V VILLAGE! STUDYAREA | 
H 
(IBRO:, 
  
IE AUC 
GBPL HE D, 
Figure 2. Village-wise fodder availability at optimal extraction 
AHMEDABAD | 
AL MUR A 
i 
  
  
  
  
l1 LJ 
= 
L1 
EURPLUS 
i. - 25 
it = 50 
& 1 75 
7T 10 © 
DEF! CET 
ii 2h 
2e £0 
21 T5 
. TK 
RIVER 
VILLACE/ 
(ES, 
API HE OD, 
VILLAGES 
i %) 
(94 
| 9 
(84 
VvVILLACES 
m. 
a 
- 
6 9) 
í %} 
STUDYAHEKA 
AHMEDAE AH 
AL MOHKA 
  
Figure 3. Village-wise fodder availability at total extraction 
677