natural
ition of
cal and
shallow
e deep,
cent by
ands of
y deep
hallow,
cent by
erately
uitable
Is and
and the
natural
et al.,
1998a)
tration,
tisgarh
ematic
?35' to
area of
g from
ni-arid
annual
immer
The
period
ituated
> data
logical
| and
rimary
The
geo-
g and
| GIS.
ase of
eneric
linked
BMS.
depth,
IAPRS & SIS, Vol.34, Part 7, “Resource and Environmental Monitoring”, Hyderabad, India, 2002
slope, drainage, surface form, particle size class and pH are
generated using 'reclassification' of the soil master layer with
the respective data of each theme. The spatial statistics of each
soil parameter has been carried out. Map polygons were
digitized on SPANS Ver. 7.0 GIS software (PCI, 1998). The
digitized data formed the spatial database.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Soil qualities based on one or more land characteristics (FAO,
1976) are important for developing a suitable land use plan.
Eswaran et al, (1993) considered soil qualities like nutrient
availability, effective soil volume, soil erodibility, soil depth,
texture, slope condition and pH as important parameters for
sustainable land use planning. Information on these features is
well understood through thematic maps and their statistical
interpretations (Tyner, 1992). Thematic maps pertaining to
slope, surface form, drainage condition, soil depth, particle size
classes, pH status, drainage and erosion of this area are
presented and discussed.
Slope
Slope has a direct influence on land use and land management.
Risks of erosion are higher on lands of steep slopes. Nearly 76
per cent of the district is covered by gentle (1-3%) to very
gently sloping (3-8%) slopes (Fig.1). Moderately slopes (8-
15%) and moderately steep slopes (15-30%) are covering 15
per cent of TGA respectively. The steep slopes (>30%) are
occupied nearly 9 per cent of the TGA. Adoption of soil
conservation measures on such sloping lands is essential to
avoid the land degradation. As per the norms of land capability
classification slope are considered for agriculturally suitable,
however most favoured are lower slope gradient.
Bilaspur District
Y
BL — S —5
5 0 15 km
e Legend
& [ZE Very gently sloping (1-396)
© L7 Gently Sloping (3-8%)
4 # [J Moderately Sloping (8-15%)
4 % [7] Mod. steep sloping (15-309)
aV "y [EX] Steepty sloping (30-506)
>
9
Reference
+ District Headquarter
Tahsil Headquarter
— District boundary
River
State Highway
— National Highway
—— Railway Line
Pandana '
ès f
Kandarpur Takheipur
°
x
Mungeli
Fig.1. Slope map of Bilaspur district.
Surface Form
747
Landforms and their processes are having direct influence on
soil development, land use and land management. Nearly 20
per cent of the district is covered by hummocky landforms, 24
per cent by level plains and 16 per cent by valleys (Fig.2). The
remaining area is covered by gently sloping lands, plateau,
dissected plateau, rolling plateau, ridges, undulating, undulating
valleys and dissected valleys. Land users generally prefer level
plains to moderately gently sloping land for cropping.
Bilaspur District
SURFACE FORM
A
5 0 15 km
Legend
[E273 Gently sloping
[7 Hummocky
[Level
LL.) Plateau
[7] Plateau & Dissected
[7j Plateau & Rolling
RE Ridges
LL.) Undulating
4 [— Undulating & Valleys
Valleys
& EE Valleys & Dissected
S
Reference
@ District Headquarter
9 Tahsil Headquarter
—— District boundary
River
—— State Highway
National Highway
— Railway Line
Fig.2. Surface form map of Bilaspur district.
Soils
The soils of the district are developed in situ on Schistose and
Granite Gneiss, Granite Schist and sandstone (Cuddapah)
formations. The soils on hummock areas are shallow to very
shallow, well drained, loamy-skeletal. Typic Ustorthents
whereas the soils on level to gently sloping lands, dissected and
rolling plateau, undulating and valleys are slightly deep to deep,
well drained and clayey. Soils on undulating lands are loamy
Typic Haplustalfs (Tamgadge et al, 1996). Soil map at
subgroup level is depicted in Fig.3 and their area coverage is
shown in Table 1.
Bilaspur District
Legend
SOILS LL. Typic Hplustalfs
MR Typic Rhodustaifs
Lithic Ustorthents
Ej Typic Ustorthents
Typic Haplustepts
Udic Haplustepts
[EZ] Vertic Haplustepts
Chromic Haplusterts
EZ Typic Haplusterts
5 0 15 km
Reference
e District Headquader
9 — Tahsil Headquarter
— District boundary
River
—— State Highway
—— National Highway
—— Railway Line