Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

   
Istanbul 2004 
— 
  
  
  
  
  
  
iverages and 
© X-axis 
iges taken on 
xels in these 
, B and L- 
ficiency was 
values were 
was almost 
s 0.35% for 
for R, 61% 
were 0.7%, 
ation values 
reas, which 
   
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
0%-saturation of Lumiance-channel 
e * 
0.2 4 es : + + i e 
Soro 9o. 4 —4::9: 0:9. Coe 
deles beso dell elle eoe etel 
Essi essc 
03417 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 6. 0%-saturation of luminance-channel of CIR-positive 
images. 
were black. Example of image-detailed-data of 0%-saturation 
of luminance-channel can be seen on figure 6. 
In general, the statistics of images of single flight were quite 
uniform, even though scanning parameters were determined 
using only a few images of the flight (Figure 3). From the 
image-detailed efficiency plots of all the flights a few flights 
with exceptionally low efficiency could be found. This 
indicates that tuning of the scanning parameters using statistics 
calculated from a few sample images will probably lead to 
acceptable scanning statistics of the whole flight. 
4.3 Radiometry of enhanced orthophotos 
To determine optimally enhanced CIR-image suitable for 
visual forestry and agricultural applications, preliminary 
investigations of enhanced orthophotos were made using 20 
images received from three image producers and image users 
(two Forestry Centres). R, G, B, L, I, H and S-histograms and 
their statistics were calculated from the images. Different 
kinds of areas (fields and various forest objects) of size 
100x100 pixels were cropped from the original images and the 
same histograms and statistics were calculated. According to 
these statistics, all images were considered to have good 
radiometric quality, even though in visual analysis every image 
appeared different, so also their interpretability varied. 
After these studies and response received from co-operative 
partners, a decision was made that the optimally enhanhed 
CIR-image would not be defined by numerical factors but 
rather a radiometrically and visually high quality image would 
be created from the scratch. A scanned CIR-image from 
southern part of Finland from summer 2003 was chosen as a 
basis for this work. 
The criteria’s for the radiometric enhancements were: 
e To get coniferous and deciduous trees separated from 
^ach other and at the same time set the balance of red 
and green colours so that the composition of stands of 
mixed forest would be interpretable. : 
e To seek optimal tone for open rock- and other 
inorganic areas. 
e To avoid dark forest shadows to get saturated. 
  
Figure 7. Original aerial image and tone-model-image. 
Efficiencies 
oser 
200 — 
150 
100 4— 
  
  
  
  
| Orig. R Model R Orig. G Model G Orig. B Model B 
  
Figure 8. Efficiencies of original image and tone-model-image. 
For justifying the preliminary adjustments a field control was 
made with two forest interpretation specialist from the Forestry 
Development Centre Tapio. After this final enhancements were 
made. The result, tone-model-image, is presented in Figure 7. 
For the fine-tuning also larger scale model images of various 
object types were extracted. 
The usability of the model-image was tested with several CIR- 
images taken on various stages of growing season around 
Finland. Excluding Lapland, all images were possible to be 
adjusted to match visually with the model-image. 
Even though the enhancement procedures were made in such a 
way that the efficiencies of all histograms were followed, some 
loss of information especially in the near-infrared-channel (red) 
could not be avoided. The efficiencies of original and final 
image are presented in figure 8. 
5. DISCUSSION 
5.1 Histogram QC 
The purpose of the 10096-QC of scanned images is to ensure 
the suitability of the images for further use. The most 
descriptive statistics for QC are efficiency, 99%-efficiency and 
saturation. Efficiencies and saturation monitor the histogram 
from opposite directions; if efficiency is at its maximum, 
saturation may exceed its tolerance values. The difference 
between efficiency and 99%-efficiency is that efficiency is 
more easily controlled during the scanning process, but the 
99%-efficiency describes the utilization of the histogram 
better. Efficiency may contain some insignificant amounts of 
DNs that are excluded in 99%-efficiency. 
   
         
   
    
  
    
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
   
   
   
    
   
  
    
     
    
      
     
   
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.