Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
the fastatic method with an accuracy 0.1 m in the terrain for the 
values of x, y and z. During the survey, the terrain points were 
documented with photographs, on which the terrain situation 
and survey position were visible. They were used together with 
_ photographic sketches for pointing out the points on images 
(Figure land 2 .). 
The process of determining coordinates future points to be used 
for correlation and for controlling mapping quality of the 
achieved points constituted a very important element. In each 
case we tried to ensure that the accuracy of GCP identification 
on the imagery was definitely below one pixel. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
oO 
u^ 
c 
< 
= 
80 en = 
S| e — — 
LI mat = 
Eh fehle 
esq a 
el >= © 
of © = 
2) x 
en| — 
>| 5 
S| M 
RN FC _ 
2 = 
E EL HS | 
© —— 
-x e = 
= > 
tas 
Cl r^ 
e 
e 
en 
cn — 
Bl 2 |= = 
Al CSS > x 
BR oo & 3 
E Se SE = 
Z m u^ = 
of) © wv 
= ve 
= = 
ua = 
S = 
© 
à 
> 
E 
c 
= 
b e 
= = 
S S w^ © 
Ella qu à pré 
> — | © CN 
e e © E 
es S = 
eiue T = 
Zl © = 
o = 
= zs = 
= 2 7 e— 
2 2 sl SS 
= —| 3 
C e 
e^ m 
; E. [8 © 
Sea OO = TT 
wl ule e u^ À 
a. xc 
Ere s 
+ == ES 
e © 
S 
= 
© 
r-—-1 
2 
= 
oS 
bb S| — 
9. =| = 
en Zo A 
= | t9 Nod N qm! 
= = ol o| 2 "£I zc 
el* s = à “| 2 Z 
= | 2 St az. s c 
e cis me zm Se uu i 
mj o E| €| a £l. 
0; 5} 5 = © al AN 
en € mI Ru ul 9|. ^ 
E eoe guess: S 5 
on o0 = a 2| SI EI DI € 
3 = Bl DO RN 5 25 
= Al Tl nl =| O m& ruv 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 1. Characteristics of imaging used 
  
   
20 
  
di Scloctnd 
GCP on 
"vy Image 
Figure 1. Projected identification GCP on QuickBird imaging 
fragment 
"eus 
"i 
Figure 2. Photo-point measured with a use of GPC identified in 
imaging 
Thanks to the use of a GPS receiver for acquiring the points, all 
coordinates are of exactly the same accuracy of measurement, 
which considerably affects the result of adjustment. For ortho- 
adjustment we used two types of DEM: Digital Terrain 
Elevation DATA-Level 2 like accuracy type of grid 1x2” and 
height accuracy 5-7 meters, as well as grid 25x25 m and height 
accuracy 1-3 meters. 
2.1 PROCESSING 
Ortho-adjustment process were conducted using commercially 
available software: PCI Geomatica 9 including a module Ortho- 
Engine. This software enables the use of several methods of 
geometrical adjustment. In the framework of tests two methods 
were used: 
Rational polynomial coefficient (RPC) method is the 3D model 
describing the relations land-image in form of polynomial 
quotient. “Firmware information” of mathematical relations in 
form of RPC coefficients is transferred within the image 
ordered. Terms of polynomial have no simple physical or 
  
LjuickBird 
Internationa 
geometrical 
camera of th 
“non-param« 
DEM heigh 
they are fre 
coefficient ti 
The Param 
between the 
model have 
construction 
condition Oo 
applied not 
Parametrica| 
distribution 
research we 
approach of 
type image 
presumed th 
the “1992” | 
ETRS89 sy 
namely GC] 
this system. 
orthophoton 
range were i 
We acquir 
IKONOS) w 
of a camerz 
(RPC) meth 
of adjustmei 
10 present 
orthophotop 
of ortho-ad 
depending © 
checked on 
process of o 
checked upc 
in number 
adjustment 
other words 
correlation 
following sc 
- used vi 
basis o 
- used vi 
basis 0 
10.00. p 
9.00 
8.00 
7.00 
6,00 
5.00 
4.00 
3.00 
2.00 
RMSE on check points - (ICPs) [m] 
1.00 
  
0.00 re 
Figure 3. 
Ve
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.