Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

   
   
  
   
   
    
   
   
     
     
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
   
   
   
  
  
   
   
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
   
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004 
5. MATCHING 
In order to automatically extract the DTM / DSMs from the 
linear array images (airborne or spaceborne), algorithms and 
software package developed in our group (see Gruen et al., 
2002 and Zhang et al., 2003) have been used. 
The matching algorithm combines the matching results of the 
feature points, grid points and edges. It uses a modified version 
of the MPGC (Multi Photo Geometrically Constrained) 
matching algorithm (see Gruen, 1985, Gruen et al., 1988 and 
Baltsavias, 1991) and can achieve sub-pixel accuracy for all the 
matched features. 
Figure 7 shows the workflow of our image matching procedure. 
  
| images and Orientation Data | 
  
  
Image Pre-processing & Image 
Pyramid Generation 
  
; | 
| Geometrically 
  
  
Constrained 
Feature Point | Grid Point Candidate Search, 
Matching | | Edge Matching Matching Adaptive Matching 
l Parameter 
Determination 
X 
  
  
  
  
  
y 
DSM (intermediate) 
Combination of feature points, grid points and 
edges 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Modified Multi-image Geometrically 
Constrained Matching (MPGC) 
Final DSM 
Figure 7. Workflow of the image matching procedure. 
  
  
For the DSM/DEM generation, the SPOT-5/HRS images and 
the previously triangulated orientation elements were used. 
After the pre-processing of the imagery and production of the 
image pyramid, the matches of three kinds of features, i.e. 
feature points, grid points and edges, are found progressively in 
all pyramid levels starting from the low-density features on the 
images with the lowest resolution. A Triangular Irregular 
Network (TIN) based DSM is constructed from the matched 
features on each level of the pyramid and is used in turn in the 
subsequent pyramid level as approximation for the adaptive 
computation of the matching parameters. Finally the modified 
MPGC matching is used to achieve more precise results for all 
the matched features on the original resolution level (level 0) 
and to identify some inaccurate and possible false matches. The 
raster DTM / DSMs are interpolated from the original matching 
results. 
The main features of this matching procedure are: 
e It is a combination of feature point, edge and grid point 
matching. The grid point matching procedure uses 
relaxation-based relational matching algorithm and can 
bridge over the non- / little-texture areas through the local 
smoothness constraints. Edges are introduced to control the 
smoothness constraints in order to preserve the surface 
discontinuities. 
e The matching parameters include the size of the matching 
window, the search distance and the threshold value for 
cross-correlation and MPGC (Least Squares matching). For 
instance, the procedure uses a smaller matching window, a 
larger search distance and a smaller threshold value in 
rougher terrain areas and vice versa. The roughness of the 
terrain is computed from the approximate DSM on the 
higher level of image pyramid. The adaptive determination 
of the matching parameters results in higher success rate 
and less false matches. 
e Line features are important for preserving the surface 
discontinuities. For this reason a robust edge matching 
algorithm, which uses the adaptive matching window 
determination through the analysis of the image contents 
and local smoothness constraints along the edges, is 
combined into our procedure. 
eo Together with point features, edges (in 3D) are introduced 
as breaklines when a TIN-based DSM is constructed in 
order to provide good approximations for the matching on 
the next pyramid level. The computation of the approximate 
DSM for the highest-level image pyramid uses a matching 
algorithm based on the iregion-growingi strategy (Otto et 
al., 1988). According to this approach the already measured 
GCPs and TPs are considered as i seed pointsi . 
e The quality control procedure consists of (1) the local 
analysis of the smoothness and consistence of the 
intermediate DSM on each image pyramid level (2) the 
analysis of the difference between the intermediate DSMs 
and (3) the analysis of the MPGC results. Blunders can be 
detected and deleted. 
e For each matched feature, a reliability indicator is assigned. 
Its value is based on the analysis of the matching statistics 
(cross-correlation and MPGC results). As a consequence, 
different weights are used during the generation of the grid- 
based DSM/DEM. 
Considering the characteristics of the SPOT-5/HRS image data, 
some small modifications were introduced in our matching 
procedure: 
e The HRS imagery has 10 meters resolution in cross-track 
direction and 5 meters in along-track direction (parallax 
direction). This configuration may result in better accuracy 
for point determination and DEM generation, but causes 
some difficulties during the (area-based) matching 
procedure. In order to avoid the problems, the images have 
been resampled from 10m x 5m to 10m x 10m and 
processed with our matching procedure (expect the MPGC 
part). Then the MPGC (Least Squares matching) was run on 
the original images in order to recover the original matching 
accuracy. This two-step method results in the reduction of 
the search distance between corresponding points, which is 
equivalent to the reduction of the possibility of false 
matching and the processing time. 
e In some difficult areas, like small and steep geomorphologic 
features (an example is shown in Figure 8), some manually 
measured points can be introduced as iseed pointsi. This 
operation gives better approximations for the matching. 
  
iid 
Figure 8. Manually measured seed points in difficult areas (two 
small hills with steep slopes). 
Inter 
—— 
The 
| incli 
(rou; 
| orde 
softv 
(feat 
featu 
mass 
mate 
Figur 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.