Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

    
  
  
    
   
   
  
   
  
    
  
   
  
    
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
     
    
    
   
    
    
   
    
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
        
    
2. CBERS- 
0 cover the 
WFD, High 
lurring due 
ced by the 
f the Point 
ice since it 
us Field of 
he imaging 
eroi Bridge 
the spatial 
direction is 
ılation tests 
improve its 
Banon and 
RS-1 CCD 
“CD spatial 
n in along- 
e. On-orbit 
(Brazil) and 
ited States) 
along-track 
ayload with 
ld Imager), 
led Device) 
ectral bands 
ymatic band 
pushbroom 
id. provides 
20 meters at 
The signal acquisition system operates in two channels called 
CCDI and CCD2. The first one generates images corresponding 
to. B2, B3 and B4 while the second generates images 
corresponding to the bands Bl, B3 and B5. In each channel 
(channel CI and channel C2), three CCD chips per band were 
combined to generate about 6000 pixels per row. 
3. PSF ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY 
Basically, there exist three ways to determinate the PSF. The 
first one uses images with targets that must have well-defined 
shape and size as airport runway, bridges, etc or artificial target. 
The second method utilizes images acquired by higher 
resolution sensor, which are compared with the image under 
study. Finally, the third one uses the system design 
specifications and the system analytic model (Fonseca, 1987; 
Fonseca and Mascarenhas, 1987). 
The first two approaches have the advantage of estimating the 
imaging system PSF by using in-flight images acquired by the 
system. In this work, the first approach was implemented and 
on-orbit images of bridges were chosen as target to estimate the 
spatial resolution in along-track and across-track directions. 
3.1 Target Images 
The Rio-Niteroi Bridge over Guanabara Bay (Figure 1 and 
Figure 2) was chosen as target to estimate the spatial resolution 
in the along-track direction. This bridge is 13.29-km long with 
only one deck and its width is 26.6 meters. On the other side, 
the Causeway Bridge over the Lake Pontchartrain (Figure 3 and 
  
  
  
  
         
     
   
Rio de Janeiro / Büzios 
— hulopisla 
    
Xem 
AM H a 4 a NE 
te ue Lan” Ogfuin fs Bi 
ou ; VR LAGOS fi HER 
bt + / (becs 4 
E fo 
ROE NERS 2 ve 
  
  
  
Fig.1 Map of Rio-Niteroi bridge in 
Guanabara bay. 
  
  
  
  
  
Fig.2 Aerial image of Rio-Niteroi bridge in 
Guanabara bay. 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004 
Figure 4) was used as target to estimate the spatial resolution in 
across-track direction. The bridge is constituted of two decks 
and a gap between them. The target is a 38.62-km long double 
deck bridge where each deck is 10.0 meters width and the gap is 
24.4 meters width. The two decks of the bridge were 
constructed at different times (1956 and 1969) and exhibit 
slightly different reflectance. In addition, the water background 
is reasonably uniform. 
3.2 Data preparation 
The Rio-Niteroi Bridge and Lake Pontchartrain Causeway 
Bridge images were acquired by CBERS-1 CCD sensor on 
December 02, 2001 and October 06, 2002, respectively. Figure 
5-top and Figure 6-left show, respectively, Rio-Niteoi bridge 
and Causeway bridge images of band 3. In order to facilitate the 
visualization, the images were enhanced by histogram contrast 
and zoomed up. 
The images acquired by CBERS-1 system, before any kind of 
processing (raw data), present a striping effect as shown in the 
Figures 5 (top) and 6 (left). Odd columns are brighter than even 
columns. This is due to the non-uniform detector gains, since 
each detector is responsible for one column in the images. The 
processing procedure to remove the stripping effect has been 
described in (Bensebaa, et al. 2003). 
Figure 5 (bottom) and Figure 6 (right) display the processed 
images of Rio-Niteroi Bridge and Causeway Bridge, 
respectively. One can observe that the striping effect has been 
completely eliminated without removing the target information. 
  
   
    
     
      
  
  
i d Nu ME j > / 
X | ha Mu. 3 
\ FAR " \ j 
1 5 3 i | t ils 
d ,,Madeonvilla Point Faut fer, x 
Lakes <> À > 
Haute Causeway Fault | 
sf. J 
d gi 2 " 
ji aka $i Tn 
d €! (Gouso Point Faut 
ÍT Pontchartrain 4) Guam : 
i m 
il South Point Fault 
T 0 i t. VU 
m NW t Borgne - 
* Me: { p" ANT, roue ant Covers 01) 
  
Fig.3 Map of Causeway bridge over 
Pontchartrain lake. 
  
  
Fig.4 Aerial image of Causeway bridge over 
Pontchartrain lake.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.