Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 1)

stanbul 2004 
|, coordinates 
leviations of 
d 0.09 pixel 
X 
- of 8555000 
(D THREE 
om the Otto- 
m with the 
rejection of 
hreshold for 
etry of high 
three images 
ism for the 
third stereo 
process was 
ch results in 
ightly better 
tained from 
d maximum 
s more than 
rence DEM 
rom two 
HMA) 
ersection 
three rays 
662143 
652764 
9.65 94) 
662076 
-100 94) 
5:16 
9.89 
-61.7 
105.3 
  
idistant grid 
x 15m pixel 
sses (forest, 
ows that the 
are best for 
cital terrain 
POT DEM. 
rd deviation 
ction. 
M derived 
52, HMA) 
e different 
ts) 
     
  
  
Cities 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Min. height difference [m] | -79.8 -81.0 -75.8 
Max. height difference [m] 79.0 90.9 59.6 
Intersection of three rays 
Forest Open Cities 
Areas 
Mean height difference | 11.57 9.82 10.74 
[m] 
Standard deviation [m] 7.16 4.22 4.47 
Min. height difference [m] | -122.0 -75.0 -106.1 
Max. height difference [m] | 66.4 52.8 61.2 
  
  
  
As shown in the accuracy analysis of the orthoimages the 
channel HMA differs about 24 m in one direction with respect 
to ground control points and keeping in mind the more complex 
shift patterns in figure 2. This can be the reason for the only 
slightly better results in the case of using three images for the 
DEM production. 
8. CONCLUSION 
It could be shown that a stereoscopic evaluation of SPOT-HRS 
data, only using ancillary data delivered by the image provider, 
leads to an absolute accuracy of terrain heights in the order of 
about 9 meter (mean height error), with standard deviations of 
about 3 meter for high quality single points (two ray stereo 
data) and 5 to 6 meter standard deviation for mass points of the 
two and three ray stereo data in comparison to the reference 
DEM. The relative and absolute accuracy for overall 
comparison of the interpolated DEM (surface model) with the 
reference DEM (terrain model) of course depends on land use 
classes and terrain steepness, since image matching algorithm 
depend on these features. For open areas a mean height error of 
about 10 meter and a standard deviation of about 6 meter is 
achieved, whereas a slightly better result (0.5 meter reduced 
standard deviation) is obtained for three ray stereo data. The 
expected improvement of three ray stereo data evaluation, 
which offers better control mechanism for the image matching 
procedure, probably is compensated by the lower performance 
of the meta data (interior orientation) of the HMA nadir looking 
channel. 
The absolute accuracy can be improved by using ground control 
points to reach a mean height difference of about 1 meter 
(Reinartz 2004). The standard deviations can probably be 
improved by DEM filtering, although not very large 
improvements are expected. 
Orthoimages can be derived to an absolute location accuracy of 
| to 2 pixels (10 to 20 meter) without ground control, which is 
in line with the performance specification. The shifts between 
the orthoimages of the HRSI/2 stereo channels are highly 
constant throughout the images, offering corrections with few 
ground control points. 
9. REFERENCES 
S. Airault, P. Gigord, L. Cunin, E. Breton, A. Bouillon, R. 
Gachet, M. Bernard, "Reference3d Location Performance 
Review and Prospects", Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop 
High Resolution Mapping from Space, Hanover, Oct. 6.-8. 
2003, IPI, Universität Hanover, on CD-ROM 
A. Bouillon, E. Breton, F. De Lussy, R, Gachet, “SPOTS 
Geometric Image Quality”, IGARSS 2003, Toulouse, 21.-25. 
July 2003, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing 
Symposium 
       
  
  
   
      
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
  
    
   
    
    
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
  
   
   
   
    
  
  
   
  
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
  
   
     
    
    
    
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part Bl. Istanbul 2004 
J.P. Gleyzes, A. Meygret, C. Fratter, C. Panem, S. Baillarin, C. 
Valorge: "SPOTS System overview and image groud 
segment”, IGARSS 2003, Toulouse, 21.-25. July 2003, IEEE 
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 
C. Heipke, W. Kornus, A. Pfannenstein, “The evaluation of 
MEOSS airborne 3-line scanner imagery — processing chain and 
results", Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 
Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 293-299, 1996 
P. Nonin, S. Piccard, "Performance analysis of DEM automatic 
extraction from SPOTS sensors", IGARSS 2003, Toulouse, 21.- 
25. July 2003, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote 
Sensing Symposium 
M. Lehner, R.S. Gill, *Semi-automatic derivation of digital 
elevation models from stereoscopic 3-line scanner data", 
IAPRS, Vol. 29, Part B4 Washington, USA pp. 68-75, 1992 
W. Linder, “Geo-Informationssyteme”, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 
Heidelberg, Germany, ISBN 3-540-65276-0, 1999 
Ru. Müller, M. Lehner, Ra. Müller, P. Reinartz, M. Schroeder, 
B. Vollmer, “A Program for Direct Georeferencing of Airborne 
and Spaceborne Line Scanner Images”, ISPRS, Comission | 
Mid-Term Symposium “Integrated Remote Sensing at the 
Global, Regional and Local Scale”, Denver, CO USA, 10-15 
November 2002 
Ru. Miiller, G. Palubinskas, P. Reinartz, M. Schroeder, V. 
Amann, R. Stitter, “From Airborne Digital Raw Data to Image 
Maps“ PFG Photogrammetrie, Fernerkundung, Geoinformation, 
Germany, 4, 4, (2003), S. 317-326 
P. Reinartz, M. Lehner, Ru. Miiller, M. Schroeder, “Accuracy 
for DEM and Orthoimages derived drom SPOT HRS Sterco 
Data without using GCP”, Proceedings of the ISPRS ux 
Congress, Istanbul 12-23 July 2004 
SPOT IMAGE, “SPOT Satellite Geometry Handbook”, S-NT- 
73-12-SI, Edition 1, Rev. 0, Toulouse, France 2002
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.