n of
| for
reas
nage
Il as
m &
IS in
AS
r to
it to
stect
cing
at
HOLS
s of
1sus
—
1SUS
the
nge
scur
ban
fied
ator
| of
sors
use
hen
ient
and
The
ing
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B1. Istanbul 2004
I. Detect urban growth
Identify and classify urban growth
t2
3. Quantify urban growth
3. METHODOLOGY
The approach that has been used in this methodology for the
image processing, is straightforward without complexity to
prepare the images for detecting urban growth and subsequent
mapping. The images were ortho-rectified using digital ortho-
photos, and then the merged layers were created, followed by
the enhancement of imagery.
Once the images were prepared, the 2001 GIS layer of
enumerator area of Statistics SA were overlayed on the
imagery. All urban change were mapped on screen, and
classified based on visual interpretation and rather than
complex classification procedures (where pixel reflection
values are grouped together), which requires visual checking
and assessment anyway for census applications. Finally the
quantification for each class was done and compared to actual
structure counts.
3.1 Data Sources
Spot Image supplied the following Spot 5 images in level 1A
for use during this study:
e Spot 5: Colour 10m
e Spot 5: Black & White 5m
e Spot 5: Supermode 2.5m
These images were ortho-rectified using the following two data
sets as ground control points (GCP)'s and elevation layer
e GCP's: Aerial Photography: Black & White Im
e Elevation Source: Digital Elevation Model € 20
metre resolution
During the study two additional data sets were created by
merging the following images:
e Spot 5: Colour 10m with Panchromatic Sm: rgb=321
e Spot 5: Colour 10m with Supermode 2.5m: rgb=321
This resulted in a total of five image data sets that were used
and evaluated in this study.
3.2 Image Preparation
All image processing steps listed below was performed in Erdas
Imagine and Orthobase modules.
e Import imagery and check imagery for radiometric
quality
= Each satellite image was imported and checked
for radiometric quality which is essential for
visual interpretation
* Ortho-rectify satellite images using the following two
inputs:
» collecting ground control points from ortho-
photos
= 20m digital elevation model (DEM)
* Accuracy assessment of ortho-rectified imagery
" imagery has been checked by overlaying and
comparing to street maps and enumerator areas
e Merge of Panchromatic and Multispectral imagery
= process of merging the 2,5m Supermode and 5m
Panchromatic images enhance the image contrast
and easier identification of structures.
* Enhancement filters
= edge enhancement filters was passed over all the
imagery to highlight boundaries between urban
and rural areas.
3.3 Processing and Mapping
Digital mapping technologies was used to create a GIS layer
that show the change in urban area between the 2001 EA layer
on the August 2002 Spot 5 imagery. The change is however
actually from a longer period because the 2001 EA's are
prepared from imagery that is captured approximately 24 -18
months before the census. This is done to have enough time to
prepare for the actual census surveys.
All mapping is based on visual interpretation and heads up
digitizing of urban changes. Visual interpretation uses the
human eye and brain to consider context, shape, proximity and
texture to identify features on satellite imagery. The images
were visually scanned using a grid pattern to identify any urban
features on the imagery that is not covered by urban EA
polygons. These areas were mapped out, based on the
parameters below, as polygons to designate change for the
different periods, using the ArcGIS software modules.
e Urban areas not covered by urban EA's (smaller than
100ha)
e Urban areas in EA's with an attribute of less 20
household structures for previous census
* Backdrop imagery showing indications of new
developments (ie street patterns but no houses yet)
After the change detection polygons were mapped from the
Supermode colour enhanced image, the polygons were overlaid
on all the individual image sets. All the different classes were
tested on the complete set of images, to determine which of the
imagery contains enough detail and resolution to allow
classification into different classes.
This classification can assist with the update and demarcation of
the EA's. Each of the mapped polygons showing change was
classified into the following classes listed below:
e townhouses/cluster housing
e security estate
e low cost housing
e informal settlement
e residential (normal suburban street layout)
The criteria were that if any of the classes could not be
classified clearly from any of the five image sets it will be
considered not classified.
553