Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
in training spatial data sets. If [/, u] is divided into N fuzzy 
areas A; (i =1,---n) and fuzzy area is represented by Gaussian 
membership function, A; is defined as: 
nai 
HA Gc o Vx e [/.u] (21) 
1 = ; 
i-D(u- f -1l 
Where c; E10. Du n g; ss, 
N -1 2(N - INIn4 
CE, te, +1 c; Serm 
Ha (c; ) 1 — and gui , 8e > 
=0.5 
For example, if the discussion field is [0,1], Figure 3 is an 
instance that the discussion field is partitioned to three 
Gaussian fuzzy subsets. 
  
Degree of membership 
  
  
  
  
x 
Figure 3. Gaussian fuzzy subsets 
5. CONCLUSION 
[t is our mind in this research to achieve both of objectives. 
Firstly, the quality of spatial knowledge discovery can be 
improved by analyzing the uncertainties and its characteristics 
in each phase of spatial knowledge discovery and finding 
efficient method to reduce its uncertainties. Secondly, although 
the uncertainties of spatial knowledge discovery cannot be 
completely eliminated, the uncertainty of spatial knowledge 
discovery results can be represented in order to make use of the 
knowledge discovered in spatial knowledge discovery. In this 
paper, we briefly analyze the uncertainties in spatial data and 
spatial knowledge discovery. Then, the framework of spatial 
knowledge discovery based on fuzzy evidence theory was 
constructed. Further work aims at experimental study based 
upper theories and methods, visualization of spatial knowledge 
and uncertainty propagation law in spatial knowledge 
discovery is also our interesting. 
ACKNOWLEDGES 
The work described in this paper was supported by the funds 
from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 
No.60275021). 
REFERENCES 
Chrisman N. R., 1982. A theory of cartography error and its 
measurement in digital database. In: Proceedings of Auto- 
Carto5, pp.159-168. 
Dutton G., 1992. Handling positional uncertainty in spatial 
database. In: Proceedings of 5^ International Symposium on 
Spatial Data Mining, pp. 460-469. 
Ehlschlager C.R., 2000. Representing uncertainty of area class 
maps with a correlated inter-map cell swapping heuristic. 
Computers, Enviroment and Urban Systems, 24, pp.451~469. 
FGDC(Federal Geographic Data Committee), 1998. Content 
standard for digital geospatial metadata ¥GDC-STD-001- 
1998, National Technical Information Services, Computer 
Products Office, Springfield, Virginia, USA*. * 
Fisher P.F., 2003. Data quality and uncertainty: ships passing 
in the light. In: Proceedings of The 2"' International 
Symposium on Spatial Data Quality 2003, Edited by Shi W.Z., 
Goodchild M.F., Fisher P.F, pp.17-22. 
Goodchild M. F., 1991. Issuees of quality and uncertainty. In : 
Advances In Cartography ,edited by Muller J.C., London, 
Elsevier, pp.113-139 
Goodchild M.F, 2003. Models for uncertainty in area-class 
maps. In: Proceedings of The 2" International Symposium on 
Spatial Data Quality 2003, Edited by Shi W.Z., Goodchild 
M.F., Fisher P.F., pp.1-9. 
G. Shafer, 1976. 4 Mathematical Theory of Evidence. 
Princeton University Press. 
Li D.R., Wang S.L., Li D.Y. and Wang X.Z., 2002. Theories 
and technologies of spatial data knowledge discovery. 
Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 
27(3). pp.221^5233. 
Liu W.B., Den M. and Xia Z.G., 1999. Analysis of 
uncertainties of attributes in vector GIS. Acta Geodaetica el 
Cartographica Sinica, 29(1), pp.76-81. 
Mikhail E. M. and Ackerman F., 1976. Observations and Least 
Squares. IEP-A Dun-Donnelley Publisher, New York. 
Miller, Harvey J., Han, Jiawei, 2001. Geographic data mining 
and knowledge discovery. Taylor & Francis. 
Openshaw, S., 1989. Learning to live with errors in spatial 
database. In: Accuracy of Spatial Database, Taylor & Francis 
Ltd, New York, pp.263-276. 
S S.anand, D A. Bell and J G. Hughes, 1996. EDM: A general 
framework for data mining based on evidence theory. Data & 
Knowledge Engineering, 18, pp.189-223. 
Shi W.Z., Wang S.L., 2002. Further development of theories 
and methods on attribute uncertainty in GIS* sournal of 
Remote Sensing, 6(5) , pp.393-400. 
Shi W.Z., 2000. Theory and Methods for Handling Errors in 
Spatial data. Science Press, Beijing. 
Zhang J.X., Du D.S., 1999. Field based models for positional 
and attribute uncertainty. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica 
Sinica, 28(3), pp. 244-249. 
INTI 
GIS] 
? ASSIS 
du 
“Assist: 
KEY W 
ABSTR; 
The obje 
mapping 
Thus, the 
specific 1 
suggestir 
The built 
with pop 
GIS-data 
associate 
This pap: 
aspects o 
that a hig 
outlook « 
future tre 
would be 
1.4 Gen 
The cont 
the appli 
Imaging 
only a us 
the proce 
other inf 
numerous 
and mult 
Al 1998 
creative c 
of GIS a 
and User 
using ge 
designing 
system fc 
Current tı 
and the 
decision 
support s 
one has 
using/ins: 
decision :
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.