Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

Istanbul 2004 
polynomial 
survey points, 
when applied 
1 insignificant 
Xf control and 
'C), supplied 
'ormations 
good results 
software was 
iclude RPC, 
' are such an 
ms represent 
eir use is an 
nodel of the 
ed by means 
sis of points, 
ts, normally 
> used. The 
MS error in 
respectively. 
location of 
  
X points 
dy 
Pixels 
-2.700 
-0.598 
-1.328 
-0.402 
0979 
-2.342 
-0.369 
-3.238 
-0.820 
1.334 
-1.521 
-2.606 
2.388 
2.010 
-2.387 
1.89 
3.24 
)und 
m] 
0 
6 
— 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ints 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
After the orthorectification the obtained maximal displacement 
and RMS error in position of the check points are 2.30 and 1.54 
m, respectively. 
The analysis of the results shows that this approach ensures the 
needed accuracy for scale 1:5000 in the range of the entire 
image. 
  
i WE 
B3 01 
à 25 
& 2; 
424 À 20 
A16 515 
409 
D3 22 A 14 4A 23 
084 
à 26 
A 19 
106 £17 
2s 2 
505 A 2i 
Ai | 
404 | 
H 503 | 
  
® Control point à Check point 
Figure 2. Points location within the imagery 
Since these models do not correspond to the geometric relations 
it is better to be applied in cases, when sufficient additional 
information is available (points and vector objects), which 
information could be used for control of the orthorectified 
image. 
6. REVISION OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 
The obtained orthoimage is used for revision of the map at 
1:5000 scale. 
Due to the limitation, imposed by the resolution of the satellite 
image, not all objects can be identified with sufficient accuracy 
and clearness. 
. The boundaries between separate properties are clearly 
visible, but hardly classified. The basic information about 
them is taken from the available digital model. 
. Large residential and industrial buildings of a similar type 
are clearly visible on the image and can be plotted in 
accordance with the required accuracy. 
. The small buildings and buildings with complex outline 
are not well recognised. In order to secure their accurate 
and proper representation, information from the digital 
model of cadastre and additional check (interpretation) 
and field surveys, are made. 
* The streets, roads and separation strips are easy to be 
identified. 
. Single train and tram rails are not clearly recognisable. 
The stations, however, are clearly visible. 
. Water areas — lakes, swimming pools, dams, as well as 
their facilities are easily and accurately identifiable. 
e. Some of the water flows can be identified indirectly, 
while corrected river beds are clearly visible. 
e It is impossible to identify the terrain elevation by a single 
scene (without a sterco-pair). In order to depict the relief 
contours, spot heights and break lines from the cadastre 
are used. 
When object boundaries are unclear and can not be identified 
properly, other sources of information are used: 
e Data from the cadastral information. 
e Field interpretation of the image. 
e Field survey. 
7. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY OF 
ORTHOPHOTO IMAGES, OBTAINED FROM 
AEROPHOTO AND SATELLITE IMAGES 
The rapid development of sensor technologies and decrease of 
the pixel size on the earth's surface lead to the following 
questions: 
. Up to what scales and for what purposes the use of acrial 
photographs or satellite images is justified? 
e Is it justifiable to involve more expensive activities for the 
topographic maps at 1:5000 scale? 
In respect to this a comparative analysis of accuracy of an 
orthophotoimage obtained from satellite image and one from 
aerial photographs is performed. 
An aerial photography of a part of Sofia with area 4.5 km” is 
used. This is a region, having relatively high buildings and 
rapidly changing infrastructure. It is covered by 3 strips with 18 
aerial photographs in total. 
Data about the photography: 
° Aerial survey camera RMK A 15/23. 
. Approximate image scale 1:4500. 
e Average flight height above the terrain 690 m. 
The aerial triangulation is based on 8 control points, pre- 
marked on the terrain. The achieved accuracy is established by 
9 check points. The results are compared in Tables 3 and 4, 
where Xm, Y m, Zm are average coordinates calculated from all 
models, and Xg, Yg, Zg are geodetically determinated 
coordinates, as well as dXY is the ground displacement of the 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
points. Unacceptable residuals are marked with an asterisk (*). 
Ne Xm-Xg | Ym-Yg Zm-Zg dXY 
Im] [m] [m] [m] 
[1 -0.06 -0.06 -0.26* 0.08 
13 -0.01 0.07 0.14 0.07 
24 0.02 0.03 0.19 0.04 
16 -0.08 -0.07 -0.22* 0.10 
31 0.09 0.05 -0.22* 0.11 
26 -0.01 0.01 -0.19 0.02 
44 0.00 -0.06 0.18 0.06 
46 -0.02 -0.07 -0.22* 0.08 
RMS: 0.05 0.06 0.20* 0.08 
MAX: 0.09 0.07 0.26* 0.11 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 3. Ground control points residuals 
389 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.