Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

Istanbul 2004 
Arable 
€) A-Typel 
A &-Type2 
@) &Type3 
A-Types 
     
Forage 
© F-Type2 
Q F-Typel 
@ F-Type3 
-) Maize 
D Trees 
@ Single Trees 
@ Forest 
y? Roads 
9 R-Type2 
Q R Type! 
B Houses 
© Eright-roof 
@ Dark-root 
D Forest-Shadow 
‘ognition and 
rtesy of the 
id Land 
many) 
age land varies 
reason several 
v samples have 
ion, four levels 
"ucture 
es) 
's only was not 
d. In a second 
1g class related 
different levels 
   
Shadow 
on, found by 
y field checks 
good basis for 
ng uncertainty 
pot 
he same image 
e shown that 
hierarchy have 
ication results 
ason for this is 
alues of forage 
color of some 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
  
types of arable land is very close to the color of roads or 
building roofs. Therefore, additional information such as a more 
spectral bands would be necessary in order to improve or 
stabilize the result (Oesterle 2003). 
4.3 Updating the LPIS 
The classification result is a good source to direct an operator in 
detecting changes in the LPIS data set. 
The class outlines can either be exported to a GIS for interactive 
work or an intersection of the classification result with the 
available data might be provided to the operator. The latter one 
might be a used a more convenient solution, as an operator can 
superimpose the original image and the detected differences. 
  
Figure 7: Intersection of LPIS data and classification result 
The Intersection of LPIS data with the classification result is 
shown in Figure 7. The black areas show differences between 
the data sets to the operator. By visual checking it was found 
that 
l. Trees had been rooted out or planted 
2. A new non-concrete road had been built 
3. The field pattern changed (agricultural parcels) 
The decision how to deal with these changes is in the operators 
responsibility. 
S. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 
The paper investigated a variety of issues for updating a Land 
Parcel Identification system. A strategy is developed and 
recommendations have been drawn. These recommendations 
will be shortly summarized in the following. 
Orthophotos are recommended to be implemented in the LPIS. 
These orthophotos can be produced, based on aerial images. 
The aerial image might be recorded by airborne or spaceborne 
Systems. For classification color or better multispectral images 
have to be taken into account. For classification of land covers, 
the season of exposure is of importance. The images have been 
taken in seasons, where arable and forage land is 
distinguishable. To guarantee that this holds for all images used 
for updating LPIS is a certain problem with very high-resolution 
satellites and maybe also for airborne remote sensing. The 
problem could be minimized by taking images by systems with 
519 
a large swath like SPOT 5, however, the resolution of these 
satellite images is not sufficient for LPIS. In orthophoto 
production we have to deal with errors caused by leaning effects 
and height errors of the height models used for rectification. 
Using systems with a good relation of flying height and ground 
coverage can reduce these errors. In this regard high resolution 
satellite imagery has great benefits. Classification can help to 
update the LPIS, however a detailed methodology must be 
further worked out to guarantee a successful workflow. 
It would be an advantage for classification, if the images are 
recorded within a short period. This guarantees a nearly same 
appearance (color, brightness) of land cover of the whole area. 
A problem is the season of exposure is that the land cover 
should be distinguishable. It is less recommended to take 
images in spring, when grassland as well as arable land is 
presented in green color all over. 
7. REFERENCES 
Definiens, 2001. eCognition User Guide Version 2.0. Edited by 
Definiens Imaging GmbH; Munich, Germany 
DIGITALGLOBE, — 2003. "QuickBird Imagery — Products" 
Longmont Colorado 
http://www .digitalelobe.com/downloads/QuickBird Imagery 
  
Products - Product Guide.pdf 
(accessed 10. June 2003) 
DLR, 2002. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, 
Institut für Weltraumsensorik und Planetenerkundung. 
"High Resolution Stereo Camera - Airborne Extended HRSC- 
AX", Berlin-Adlershof, Germany. 
http://solarsvstem.dlr.de/FE/hrsc.shtml (accessed 10. June 2003) 
  
EUR-Lex,, 1999. EU-Legislation "Council Regulation (EC) No 
1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support system for 
producers of certain arable crops.” 
http://europa.eu.int/eur- 
lex/pri/en/oj/dat/1999/1 160/1_16019990626en00010014.pdf 
(accessed 10. June 2003) 
  
  
EUR-Lex, 1992. EU-Legislation "Council Regulation (EEC) No 
3508/92 of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated 
administration and control system for certain Community aid 
schemes." 
http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cei/sga doc?smartapi!celexapi!pro 
d!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31992R3508& model=gui 
chett 
(accessed 10. June 2003) 
EUR-Lex, 2000. EU - Legislation "Council Regulation (EC) No 
1593/2000 of 17 July 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 
3508/92 establishing an integrated administration and control 
system for certain Community aid schemes" 
http://europa.eu.int/eur- 
lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2000/1_182/1_18220000721en00040007.pdf 
(accessed 10. June 2003) 
  
  
ImageSat International, 2003. "Satellites", Limassol, Cyprus 
http://www.imagesatintl.com/aboutus/satellites/satellites.shtml£ 
(accessed 10. June 2003) 
ITRES, 2002. "Compact airborne spectrographic Imager 2", 
Calgary, Canada. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.