International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004
voneinander entwickelt worden waren. Allerdings entstand dadurch ein neues Problem. Bereits bestehende Datenbankensysteme und
GIS müssen mit den vorgegebenen Standards kompatibel sein, um Interoperabilität zu gewährleisten. Das soll unter anderem durch
den internationalen vereinbarten Standard zum Umfang von Datenbanken erreicht werden.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, automation of the manual systems and file systems
provided a flexibility to all sectors. Especially, independent
functional applications and databases were developed with
military purposes. Thus, first stage of the information system
development was completed. Second stage is development of
the integral (complex) information systems, such as
Consultation, Command and Control Information (C3) systems.
That is because, the existence of standalone information
systems is not sufficient any more, for the specialists and
decision mechanisms. On the global world, area of interest of
military activities covers whole world territory. For this reason,
it is required to handle huge amount of information very
rapidly. Not only the quantity but also type of the data has
changed in terms of armed forces applications. Functional Area
services. (FAS) were assessed independently so far, but
developing IT technology allowed to combine different type of
FAS together under the umbrella of Command and Control
Information Systems (C2IS). On the other hand configuration of
the C2IS could not be completed very easily, because of
incompatible ^ architecture. of ^ independently developed
functional area services applications. Data exchange and
interoperability were not maintained among these systems. At
this point, International Organizations, such as NATO,UN, EU
etc. played important roles for definition of the rules and
standards to establish common architectures or open systems
design. Especially, as the most important International Security
Organization, NATO was very dominant. That is because,
organizational requirements for Automated Information
Systems (AIS) were very urgent, organizational structure was
wide and crowded enough. The most important supportive
factor was the shared budget of NATO for developing and
testing new information systems. In terms of C2IS, use of
interdisciplinary Core Services and FAS together created a
synergy. Meanwhile, it should be mentioned that development
of the C2IS is still under progress and data exchange,
interoperability among independently developed C2IS is an
alive problem.
2. MULTILATERAL INTEROPERABILITY
PROGRAMME (MIP) TACTICAL C2IS
INTEROPERABILITY REQUIREMENT
2.1 Introduction
The application of military force in the early 21st century is
demanding. It covers a wide spectrum of threats and
deployment scenarios that range from conventional general war
through limited operations, crises response operations,
asymmetric conflict, and terrorism. Unilateral capability is
important to nations but most planning is made on the
assumption of alliance and coalition operations in scenarios that
are difficult to predict and which often arise at short notice.
Thus the nature and composition of a force structure to meet
military requirements will be specific to requirement and based
upon a general and flexible military capability.
668
To achieve this, an assured capability for interoperability of
information is essential. The successful execution of fast
moving operations needs an accelerated decision-action cycle,
increased tempo of operations, and the ability to conduct
operations ~~ within ^ combined/multinational ^ formations.
Commanders require timely and accurate information. Also,
supporting command and control (C2) systems need to pass
information within and across national and language
boundaries. Moreover, tactical C2 information must be
provided to the operational and strategic levels of command
including other governmental departments. Additionally, forces
must interact with non-governmental organisations, including
international aid organisations.
The Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP) aims to
deliver an assured capability for interoperability of information
to support land focused joint operations[4].
2.20 Aim and use of MIP in the C2IS
The aim of the Multilateral Interoperability Programme (MIP)
is to achieve international interoperability of Command and
Control Information Systems (C2IS) at all levels from corps to
the lowest appropriate level, in order to support combined and
joint operations; and pursue the advancement of digitization in
the international arena, including NATO.
The means to achieve this will be known as the MIP solution.
This will take into account issues regarding the establishment of
communication and information systems connectivity, and the
establishment of a C2IS interface that fulfils common
information exchange requirements.
The Programme has gone through the stages of: operational
analysis, concept, feasibility, definition, development and
demonstration. The present focus is on implementation and the
programme has adopted a controlled iterative cycle to support
incremental development. The information exchange
requirements, upon which MIP is founded, encompass the
spectrum of Joint and Combined Land Operations. Thus MIP
meets the requirements of the Land Component Commander of
Allied Joint and Combined Operations (including Article 5
and Crisis Response Operations). Systems may be wholly
different from each other and need not necessarily conform to
any hardware or software standard. Typically systems will be
acquired through national or NATO acquisition programmes
and their architecture will conform to the national or NATO
policy prevailing at the time.
In a community of MIP-enabled C2 systems nations, command
levels and organisations can share:
* Situational awareness (including, inter-alia, capabilities and
status of friendly and enemy forces).
* Plans and Orders.
* NBC alerts and critical messages[4].
2.3 The MIP concept
The MIP specification consists of common interface and
exchange mechanisms (two at present) to exchange information
between co-operating but diverse C2 systems. The common:
interface is the Land C2 Information Exchange Data Model,
LC2IEDM. It is a product of the analysis of a wide spectrum of
allied information exchange requirements. It models the
Inter!
infor
excha
comn
battle
disple
Syste
inclu
to C2
inforr
what
2.4 (
Comr
as tl
aware
has a
GIS,
techn
“Deci
decis]
reliab
of tir
mode
comp
homo
organ
Furth
syster
own 1
order
adapt:
hierar
specif
need
princi
netwae
parad
netwc
comp:
The b
servic
servic
servic
daemc
of het
view,
distrit
points
rangir
Lo fi
maint