Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 2)

1l 2004 
ges; 
tial 
ted 
an 
1€ 
2.  Decision-makers at different decision-levels can 
make sensible consistent decisions on forest area 
change, because overall the two images responded 
quite similar to the LCM parameter spatial size (with 
restriction of conclusion 3). 
Decision-makers at different decision-levels need 
temporal maps that are produced with identical 
parameter settings to avoid comparing apples and 
oranges, because the LCM parameter spatial size 
proved not to be consistent in the arrangement of 
forest cover. 
m 
In addition, regarding the sensitivity estimators it can be 
concluded that the composition and configuration measures as 
used at both the class and landscape level are very useful for 
remote sensing based classifications in addition to conventional 
KHAT statistics and cover values (as measure by PLAND). In 
this respect, the indices LSI and KHAT seem to be a useful 
combination to indicate the levels of disaggregation at which 
classification results differ significantly. The indices NP and 
KHAT seem to be a useful combination to indicate which 
classes are causing significant differences between 
classification results. The indices LSI and PLAND, or NP and 
PLAND (a configuration and a composition measure) seem to 
be a useful combination to indicate suitable combinations of 
parameter settings for the LCM parameter size to compare 
temporally different images. Moreover, the indices SIDI and 
PLAND (both composition measures) seem to be a useful 
combination to indicate underlying change processes in forest 
areas. SIDI provided the area range (35-100 ha) at which a 
striking diversity change occurred, whereas PLAND indicated 
the vegetation class most likely involved (shrub vegetation). 
Combining both measures, it can be concluded that shrub, 
which is an intermediar vegetation in the transition from forest 
to agriculture and vice versa, contributed significantly to the 
change in SIDI and thus plays an important role in the 
underlying change process. This means that between 1990 and 
1996 forest is depleted not due to logging practices, but due to 
agricultural practices. This type of information can be very 
useful for decision-makers at local, provincial and national 
level, who are urged to preserve rainforest for future 
generations. 
REFERENCES 
Bandibas, J.C., Bruce, R.C. & Daels, L., 1995. Using frequency 
based classifier for remote sensing of spatially heterogeneous 
land-use/land-cover systems in the tropics. Asian-Pacific 
Remote Sensing Journal 7(2), pp. 65-70. 
Beurden| A.U.CJ. van &  Douven, W.LA.M. 1999. 
Aggregation issues of spatial information in environmental 
research. /nternational Journal of Geographical Information 
Science, 13(5), pp. 513-527. 
Burnett, C. & Blaschke, T., 2003. A multi-scale segmentation/ 
object relationship modelling methodology for landscape 
analysis. Ecological Modelling, 168(3), pp. 233-249. 
Carvalho, L.M.T. de, Fonseca, L.M.G., Murtagh, F, & Clevers, 
J.G.P.W., 2001. Digital change detectio with theaid of 
multiresolution wavelet analysis. International Journal of 
Remote Sensing, 22(18), pp. 3871-3876. 
Congalton, R.G., Oderwald, R.G. & Mead, R.A., 1983. 
Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using 
discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. 
Photogrammetric Eng.&Remote Sensing, 49(12), pp. 
1671-1678. 
795 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B2. Istanbul 2004 
Cortijo, F.J. & Perez de la Blanca, N., 1998. Improving classical 
contextual classifications. /nternational Journal of Remote 
Sensing, 19 (8), 1591-1613. 
FAO, 2001. The Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 
(FRA 2000). FAO Forestry Paper 140, 
http://www.fao.org/forestry/fo/fra/main/index.jsp (accessed 5 
Nov. 2003). 
Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of 
landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, 
Cambridge, pp. 317-321. 
Gustafson, EJ, 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial 
pattern:What is the state of the art. Ecosystems, 1(2), pp. 
143-156. 
Hill, R.A., 1999. Image segmentation for humid tropical forest 
classification in Landsat TM data. [Internation Journal of 
Remote Sensing, 20(5), pp. 1039-1044. 
Hudson, W.D. & Ramm, C.W., 1987. Correct formulation of 
the Kappa coefficient of agreement. Photogrammetric 
Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(4), pp. 421-422. 
Kushwada, S.P.S, Kuntz, S. & Oesten, G., 1994. Applications 
of image texture in forest classification. /nternational 
Journal of Remote Sensing, 15 (11), 2273-2284. 
Lund, H.G., 1999. Forest classification: a definitional 
quagmire. In: The World's Natural Forests and their Role in 
Global | Processes, Khabarovsk, Russia, 17; p. 
http://home.att.net/~gklund/quagmire.htm (accessed 7 Nov. 
2003). 
McGarigal, K., S.A. Cushman, M.C. Neel, and E. Ene (2002), 
FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis. Program for 
Categorical Maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 
www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html 
(accessed 23 Feb. 2004). 
Molenaar, M., 1998. An introduction to the theory of spatial 
object modelling for GIS. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 20- 
31. 
Obbink, M.H., Clevers, J.G.P.W. & Viergever, K.M., 2002. 
Multi-level segmentation of remote sensing imagery for 
mapping forest transitions. In: Operational tools in forestry 
using remote sensing techniques Edinburgh, Scotland, 10 p. 
Palubinskas, G., Lucas R.M., Foody, G.M. & Curran, P.J., 
1995. An evaluation of fuzzy and texture- based classification 
approaches for mapping regenerating tropical forest classes 
from Landsat-TM data. /nternational Journal of Remote 
Sensing, 16 (4), 747-759. 
Schaijk-Obbink, M.H. van, Molenaar, M. & Gier, A. de, 2000. 
Tropical forest change assessment: the use of aggregates, a 
semantic approach. In: International Archives of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, The 
Netherlands, Vol. XXXIII, Part B7, p. 1601-1608. 
Whitmore, T.C., 1998. An introduction to tropical rain forests 
— 2" ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 282 p. 
Woodcock, C.E. & Strahler, A.H., 1987. The factor of scale in 
remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21, pp. 
311-332. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
SRON, Wageningen University and ITC (The Netherlands) are 
acknowledged for supporting this research. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.