International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
1065011
MÀ
1065010
|
|
Ne
1063007 | 1064007 | 1065007
= x
LLL E RA TT E
108 1064008 1065008
Figure 4 a. The valid mosaic polygons in a block area
Figure 4 b. The measurable seamless stereo model
Figure 4. The experimental results
Table 3. The error of |MAX| and RMS of terrain points
X (m)
0.083
0.044
Y (m)
0.074
0.042
Z (m)
0.084
0.045
IMAX|
RMS
nne
13 9 4 55 i1 3 39 101 11 42 1344 dc d5 d di onm
E DY []DZ
Figure 5. The error distribution diagram of terrain points
EJ DX
For Data set II, the twenty houses were selected for testing. The
heights of these houses have been measured from the original
photo pairs at the SOCET SET v4.4.0 of Leica Geosystems, Inc.
The positions of these points are located the corner of the house
roof. That is, twenty house roof corners are measured in the
measurable seamless stereo model. The maximum error and
RMS error are listed in table 4. Figure 6 illustrates the error
distribution of these twenty points.
Table 4. The error of |[MAX| and RMS of non-terrain points
X (m) Y (m) Z (m)
IMAX| 0.075 0.080 0.105
RMS 0.046 0.047 0.067
As it can be seen from Tables 3 and Table 4, the RMS errors are
very small. It means that the measurement results from the
measurable seamless stereo model are nearly similar with those
in the original photo-pair model. Compared with Table 1, it can
be found that the accuracy of 3D measurement greatly
improved.
005
01
4.15
12323487568 78 SE TRISTE EU
EJDX MDPY CIDZ
Figure 6. The error distribution diagram of non-terrain points
6. Discussions
The measurement of 3D coordinates using orthorectified stereo
images (two orthoimages of the same region (DTM) from each
of the images of a stereo pair) has been discussed by Baltsavias
(1996). The accuracy of object coordinate determination from
the orthorectified stereo images is as high as that achievable
when using the original unrectified digital images if the
measuring accuracy in the original and ortho-images is similar
(which will be the case if the ortho-images pixel size is similar
to the scanning pixel size). The correct X, Y, Z measurement
still can be made, even if the underlying DTM is with the
blunder error (Baltsavias, 1996).
As the coordinates inverse transformation from stereomate to
the orthoimage by the parallax function and DTM is a-rigorous
computation process, the measurement accuracy from the
measurable seamless stereo model is completely dependent on
the measurement accuracy in the orthorectified stereo images.
International Arch
Ve n
That it to say, th
seamless stereo m
ordinary stereo mc
is similar with th
images. Those col
measurement accu
the photos and tl
nothing to do v
orthoimage and s
seamless stereo 1
applications, espe
measurement accu
completely error-f
The experimental |
with the above acc
7. Conclusions
In this paper, the
model is proposed
and algorithm for
are presented. Th
accuracy of 3D n
stereo model is €
methodology, it ca
is great, i.e. by 20
Though the stereo
measurable seaml
provides the possi
measurement, ap:
traditional 3D mee
an orthoimage :
measurement is a
through recording
orthoimage and m:
From practical poi
such a measurable
integrated into GI:
practical and ecor
terrain features in
accurate three dir
features visible fo
and/or other appl
photo-interpretatio
electric power, gec
References
Baltsavias E.P. , 1€
the extraction
Journal of Phc
63-77
Blachut, T.J., 19