International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
Number of 2 3 4 5 6 7
invariants K
Total pairs 233 293 977 957] "948 23$
number. a=0°
Valid pairs 34 75 105 106 113 118
number, o=0
Total pairs 343 321 288 269 250 232
number. a=30"
Valid pairs I9- os 66 iq 0 9
number, a=30
Total pairs 339 >320- 276-2270 > 245-> 246
number, a=45"
Valid pairs 11 55 57 66 79 37
number, a=45
Table 8. Number of properly tied features depending on the
number of invariants K and rotation angle a
From the above, verification distance criterion based on
analysis of matrix (5) is also invariant to rotation of images.
Hence the total image matching procedure under consideration
is rotation invariant.
2.6 Mosaic creation
To perform the total montage of frames, the following
successive tasks should be solved:
l. search of tie points for pairs of successive images for
each row,
montage of separate raws using tie points,
3. search of tie points between successive rows of total
frame montage,
4. montage of total mosaic using tie points.
N
In steps 1, 2 the coordinate table of successive frames is
prepared and row montage is performed (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Example of row montage
[n steps 3, 4 the coordinate table of successive rows is prepared
and montage of total mosaic is performed (Figure 10). Total
mosaic consists of 1584 frames, each of size 400 kb. Elapsed
computing time for processor Pentium-IV, 2.0MHz, amounts to
40 min.
3. AUTOMATIC RELATIVE ORIENTATION OF
AERIAL IMAGES
The relational matching approach developed above for camera
frames junction, successfully works in automation of relative
orientation for various types of imagery. All steps of
processing, stated above for video frames, can be repeated here
and supplemented with the items specific for epipolar
geometry:
create and employ image pyramids for both images in
order to take the advantage of concept of hierarchy and
make the algorithms more effective,
extract sufficient number of features in both images on the
highest level,
match features to find candidates for conjugate pairs,
verify that conjugate pairs of point features are tied
properly, using relations among them,
define features more exactly at next pyramid levels using
cross-correlation,
estimate orientation parameters,
Figure 10. Total mosaic, 1584 frames, 81 rows
International /
- proceed v
restriction
- ' estimate
approach
The approach
in digital pho
Sibiryakov, A
are shown in
deviation of t
respectively.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
ori
Now it’s up to
meets the requ
In the preser
matching for
point features
concept of “in:
are tied accor
filtered using t
invariant to im
found can be 1
specific work.
In this study tl
mosaic creatk
automatic rela
In all cases th
computational