Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
scanning was presented. In a first step, the laser data has been 
segmented and classified. In the second step, the laser data 
segments of buildings have been matched against the 
building objects of a topographical database. 
With respect to the classification results several conclusions 
can be drawn. In general, laser data can be classified 
relatively reliable. However, to really allow fully automatic 
change detection and to ensure a low percentage of incorrect 
change detections further improvements are required. The 
largest problem in this respect is caused by vegetation 
adjacent to buildings. If this vegetation is considered as an 
extension of a building, this error will generate an incorrect 
signal for the need of a database update and thus require extra 
operator time. In this research we used average point 
distances of 1.2-1.4 m. Higher point densities may allow 
better classifications. 
For the classification experiments in this paper usage was 
made of both roughness and colour information. Colour 
information appeared to be a useful addition. The 
classification accuracy of buildings was improved by 3%. 
The additional value of colour information may, however, 
vary from project to project and depend on the season and the 
colours of the roofs. Classification results should further 
improve with the additional usage of multiple pulse data. 
In the change detection experiment all newly constructed 
buildings were detected reliably. Differences between laser 
data segments and database objects caused by generalisation 
or data noise could effectively be handled by mathematical 
morphology. More challenging is the implementation of the 
object selection rules as laid down in the mapping catalogue. 
In the case of the TOP1Ovector database, the definition of 
what to map was sometimes vague and often required a 
certain amount of scene interpretation. For the purpose of 
automatic change detection the rules of the mapping 
catalogues need to be defined more precisely and preferably 
avoid the usage of definitions which require semantic 
modelling for the interpretation of the scenery. 
In the performed experiments several errors caused by the 
mapping process of the topographical database have been 
found. This showed that automatic change detection can 
already now be a useful tool for quality control despite 
limitations in the classification accuracy and the 
interpretation of mapping rules. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The laser data for this study was provided by Terralmaging 
B.V. The TOPlOvector data was provided by the 
Topografische Dienst Nederland. The authors would like to 
thank both organisations for their support of this research. 
REFERENCES 
Kessels, P., 2003. Automatic change detection of buildings in 
the TOP10vector map using airborne laser scanner data (in 
Dutch). M.Sc.-thesis Delft University of Technology. 
Maas, H.-G., 1999. The Potential of Height Texture 
Measures for the Segmentation of Airborne Laser Scanner 
Data. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Airborne 
Remote Sensing Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp. 
154-161. 
Matikainen, L., Hyyppä, J. Hyyppä, H., 2003. Automatic 
Detection of Buildings from Laser Scanner Data for Map 
Updating. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry, 
Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Dresden, 
Germany, vol. 34, part 3/W13, pp. 218-224. 
Murakami, H., Nakagawa, K., Hasegawa, H., Shibata, T. and 
Iwanami, E., 1999. Change Detection of Buildings using an 
Airborne Laser Scanner. /SPRS Journal of Photogrammetry 
and Remote Sensing 54 (2-3): 148-152. 
Murakami, H., Nakagawa, K., Shibata, T. and Iwanami, E., 
1998. Potential of an Airborne Laser Scanner System for 
Change Detection of Urban Features and Orthoimage 
Development. In: /nternational Archives of Photogrammetry 
and Remote Sensing, Stuttgart, Germany, vol. 32, part 4, pp. 
422-427. 
Oude Elberink, S. Mans, H-G. 2000. The Use of 
Anisotropic Height Texture Measures for the Segmentation 
of Airborne Laser Scanner Data. In: /nternational Archives of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Amsterdam, The 
Netherlands, vol. 33, part B3/2, pp. 678-684. 
Sithole, G., Vosselman, G., 2003. Automatic structure 
detection in a point cloud of an urban landscape. In: 
Proceedings 2" GRSS/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote 
Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas, URBAN2003, 
Berlin, Germany, pp. 67-71. 
Sithole, G., Vosselman, G., 2004. Experimental Comparison 
of Filter Algorithms for Bare Earth Extraction from Airborne 
Laser Scanning Point Clouds. Accepted for publication in the 
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 
Steinle, E., Oliveira, F.H., Báhr, H.-P., Loch, C., 1999. 
Assessment of Laser Scanning Technology for Change 
Detection in Buildings. In: Proceedings XVIIth CIPA 
Symposium, October 3-6, Olinda, Brazil. Accessed from 
http://www-ipf.bau-verm.uni-karlsruhe.de/Projekte/SFB461/ 
C5/publications/Olinda99.pdf on April 14, 2004. 
Voegtle, T., Steinle, E., 2003. On the Quality of Object 
Classification and Automated Building Modelling Based on 
Laserscanning Data. In: International | Archives of 
Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information 
Sciences, Dresden, Germany, vol. 34, part 3/W13, pp. 149- 
155. 
     
   
     
      
    
   
    
    
   
     
   
     
    
    
   
    
   
   
   
   
     
   
    
   
    
   
    
   
     
   
    
    
   
   
   
   
      
     
   
    
    
  
  
   
   
KEY WC 
ABSTRA 
The incre 
work. In 
scanning 
urban fea 
variable v 
data with 
the roof I 
Results fr 
3D city rr 
applicatio 
building 
approach 
source. H 
the perfor 
With the 
conventio 
LIDAR L 
and featu 
been sho 
3D featur 
of data su 
Haala, 19 
LIDAR d 
point, the 
display ( 
from suck 
been trie 
some lim 
and recon 
In earlier 
algorithm 
building 
excluding 
segmenta 
histogram 
inference 
determine 
the secon 
footprints 
After obt 
each buil 
Processin 
necessary 
a refinem 
step utiliz
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.