International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
Distribution of differences in flight 
direction 
(strip 2 is reference) 
frequency 
  
meters 
Figure 5. Distribution of differences in flight direction, 39 
samples per strip. 
Distribution of differences perpendicular to 
flying direction (strip 2 is reference) 
14 
12 ——2-3 
10 
frequency 
  
meters 
Figure 6. Distribution of differences in across-track direction, 
20 samples per strip. 
Distribution of differences in heights 
(strip 2 is reference) 
   
% +25 
o 
5 —# 24! 
c —k— 2-5 
= 2-6 
-0.15 -0.05 0.05 0.15 
meters 
Figure 7. Distribution of differences in heights, 39 samples per 
strip. 
  
  
   
  
\ 
3 
flight directions 
   
  
difference 
Figure 8. Differences between laser strips 2 and 3 in A) along- 
track, B) in across-track and C) in elevation. 
N N 
> $ © os, 9 es 
: © o A Ne S 
2 x o x = C ex 
N *» X ? \ 
VENEN UN flight directions 
«e^ » oc. 9o x g 
1? 
Ao kN EY N 
De “ N NS. N N 9 x \ 4 
S ON 
0.1 m 9 ae. 
- \, a V & * e N 
difference UMS S RE 
\ 9 3 N X 
SAN à, 
e $ ea KEN 
x > N Se ^e oes 
N > S > Vu 
A)" CB c0) 
Figure 9. Differences between laser strips 2 and 4 in A) along- 
track, B) in across-track and C) in elevation. 
\ 
5 
      
0.1 m 
difference 
  
Figure 10. Differences between laser strips 2 and 5 in A) along- 
track, B) in across-track and C) in elevation. 
    
Intern« 
Se 
Figure 
track, | 
The te 
withou 
for ori 
that in 
across- 
orients 
was Ir 
Howey 
metho 
the tar; 
This r 
results 
some t 
materi: 
Hyypp 
repeata 
The m 
entity \ 
laser n 
Accord 
repeata 
seemec 
becaus: 
locatio: 
leads tt 
critical 
If the d 
wave-li 
this ph 
with G 
Beforel 
was ex 
reveal : 
could | 
sites as