Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

   
ee ae 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
1] DTM (0,5m resolution) | 
118- | Ground laser points | 
qe Low non-ground laser points, Y wk 
Wot Non-ground laser points |  4* 
1 x 
114 : ; 
4 fi 4 2 
112 : Mey, ; 
3 49r Vb. vi x 
= 4 C ys Ma ^i x e 
= 1104 one. Clin, x 
= VO Ru f i) X 
© J être 
— 108 : 
106 + V = OR S 
4 
104 
102 st 
T : T : T x T T T y T T T T 1 
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 
Along Profile (m) 
Figure 6: profile of both the final DTM (in gray) and the clas- 
sified laser points over an other location of the Roujan data set. 
red circles, vertical blue dashes and green crux are respectively 
ground, low non-ground and non-ground laser points. 
of laser data (more than 3.10° points). The propagation mech- 
anism efficiency is directly linked to the point density and as a 
result to the neighborhood dimension. 
6 DISCUSSION 
The algorithm presented in this paper classifies raw laser data 
into three classes: ground, non-ground, and an intermediary one 
with points that could belong to one of the previous ones. We 
did focus on the quality of the resulting classification as well as 
on the accuracy of the DTM. Unfortunately, we did not have in 
situ measurements for any of the laser data sets we tested. As a 
result, ground is estimated only with regard to laser points and it 
was not possible at the time of this study to provide any index of 
the classification quality. But we planed to compare classification 
results over urban areas with the related cadastral map. 
As far as the classification part is concerned, we may point out 
interesting behaviors of the algorithm. At first, the lower bound 
of the low non-ground class influences the final 3D point label. 
This parameter can be tuned with an a priori knowledge of the 
landscape composition (in a urban environment, cars (low non- 
ground) are generally lower than 1.5 m whereas in a rural area, 
non-ground vegetation begins 20 cm over the ground). It is of 
importance because points classified as low non-ground ones will 
not be considered to be attractors when it comes to compute the 
deformable model. Therefore, the final DTM will not be as accu- 
rate as it should have been. 
Secondly, the ground estimation is performed using a set of laser 
points included into a defined neighborhood. The shape of this 
neighborhood do not influence the classification. But for maxi- 
mizing the continuity of the initial surface, the overlapping ratio 
must be large enough (up to 7096). The neighborhood size must 
take into account the point cloud density (card(V) > 20 pts) 
as well as local variations of the topography (C « 20 m). It 
is always better when a real ground point is included into the 
neighborhood since laser points will be classified with regard to 
computed ground points and propagated neighboring values. 
    
   
     
   
  
    
     
   
   
     
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
  
   
    
     
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
"wo | - Affined DTM (0,5m resolution)! 
s | ——— Coarse DTM (3m resolution) | 
110 - jo ud 
e 
4 = 
x. 
— 108- a 
= x 
= + \ 
5 1064 \ / 
D 
X X / 
A 1j 
104 1 
N / 
4 X / 
V 
102 
T T T T T " T 7 T T T T T 7 = 
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 
Along Profile (m) 
Figure 7: Black line depicts Sin, (DTM after the classification 
process). Gray line is the final DTM at the top end of the process. 
  
Figure 8: Resulting 0.5 m resolution DTM of the classification of 
a mountainous area near Montmirail, South of France. These two 
pictures represent the same laser strip split up for the presentation 
concerns. Itisa 16 km long and 2.3 km wide strip. 
As a matter of course, the ICM algorithm will not make the curve 
converge toward a global energy minimum. But we must keep 
in mind that the laser point is already an integration of the real 
backscattered energy of the laser impact. Therefore, the result- 
ing punctual altitude is slightly noisy and the final attractors may 
not belong exactly to the true ground. We thereafter just need 
to compute a local minimum energy associated to the final bald 
Earth model. 
The propagation strategy ensures a coherent diffusion of the alti- 
tude information. As it is presented in Figure 9 right (Amiens), 
roads are first computed following the lowest neighboring aver- 
age altitude, then buildings are tackled. The chosen route depends 
on the initial seed. It is an on-going development to check the dis- 
crepancies of two point clouds classified from a different starting 
point. 
Interna 
Figure 
Montn 
cessing 
cessed 
We ha 
fying ¢ 
into th 
points. 
of the 
deforn 
high re 
feature 
In a ne 
ular pc 
We we 
derive 
ods de 
The ai 
affiliat 
GREF 
jan as 
discus 
Axelss 
ans ap 
Sensir 
Bretar 
ing int 
Vol. X 
mote | 
Eckste 
digital 
cal En 
Dimer 
Elma 
laser s
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.