Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
   
   
   
  
   
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
   
   
  
  
   
  
  
CLASSIFICATION METHODS FOR 3D OBJECTS IN LASERSCANNING DATA | 
D. Tóvári, T. Vógtle | 
University of Karlsruhe, Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 76128 Karlsruhe, Englerstr. 7. | 
vocetie(éipf.uni-karlsruhe. 
Commis 
KEY WORDS: Laser scanning, Classification, Detection, Fuzzy logic, Quality | 
ABSTRACT: 
The object classification can play an important role in a lot of applications of airborne laserscanning data. The filtering process and | 
the subsequent DTM generation using airborne laserscanning 
objects (e.g. vegetation, buildings etc.). On the other hand classification can be also the first step of object-specific modelling, like | 
vegetation or building reconstruction for 3D city models, design of telecommunication networks, urban planning or disaster 
management. 
A pixel-wise classification — especially when using laserscannning data - is limited in terms of reliability of its results. Therefore, the | 
first step of this approach will be a segmentation of 3D objects. 
etc.) are extracted and used for subsequent classification process. In this phase the method is based on raster data. 
For segmentation a normalised DSM (nDSM) is generated by subtracting the original laser data (DSM) from a rough DTM (created 
by a strong filtering of the DSM). Now 3D objects can be segmented by means of specific a region growing algorithm on this 
nDSM. 
Different kind of object-oriented features are calculated for each segment, like height texture, border gradients, first/last pulse height 
differences, shape parameters or laser intensities. For classification two methods have been applied, on one hand a fuzzy logic 
classification, on the other hand a statistical method (maximum likelihood). The fuzzy logic approach resulted in an overall | 
classification rate of about 95% for test site ‘Salem’ (hilly t 
confusion matrix for ‘Salem’ show that buildings were erroneous classified as trees (5%) resp. trees as buildings (4%). The most 
errors can be observed at terrain objects which are confused mainly with trees (7%). Investigations concerning the statistical | 
approach are currently done. Results and a comparison with fuzzy logic approach will be presented in this paper. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
During the last years airborne laserscanning has become one of 
the standard data acquisition methods in the field of surveying. 
Starting from the extraction of digital surface and terrain 
models (DSM, DTM) a great variety of applications has been 
   
  
  
  
   
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
Internai 
de, tovari(dipf.uni-karlsruhe.de 
sion VI, 111/4 | 
data can be significantly improved by classification of non-terrain 
For each segment object-specific features (e.g. height texture, shape 
errain) and about 90% for test site ‘Karlsruhe’ (flat terrain). The 
Inside these segments object-specific features will be extracted 
which are used in the subsequent classification process. Two 
classification methods has been used, fuzzy logie and a 
stochastic approach (maximum likelihood). The influences and 
dependences on different feature combinations as well as a 
comparison of the results of different classification 
schemes/schemata is the main topic of these investigations. 
  
developed, like creation of 3D city models, determination of 
tree parameters in forestry or control of power lines, e.g. in 
Lohr (1999). At our institute we use laserscanning data in two 
2. DATA 
different projects. On one hand detection and modelling of 
buildings is based on these data to recognize and classify rough 
damages after strong earthquakes. On the other hand a high 
resolution terrain models including the determination of 
vegetation areas (position, size, density and height of trees etc.) 
has to be extracted from airborne laserscanning data to model 
hydrologic processes, e.g. runoff models to simulate floods. 
For these purposes it is necessary to classify all 3D objects on 
the surface of the earth, i.e. mainly buildings and trees/bushes, 
in some cases also terrain objects like rough rocks which may 
be additionally included in the detected objects. Such a 
classification is the precondition for a class-specific modelling 
of buildings as well as vegetation objects. On the other hand the 
knowledge about the object type can be used for a significant 
improvement of the extraction of terrain models by a class 
dependent filtering of the original laser point cloud. 
The first step of this approach is a segmentation of the 
laserscanning data for detecting 3D objects on the terrain. 
At this state of our approach all features are derived exclusively 
from laserscanning data itself without additional information 3.1 De 
like spectral images or GIS data. This is caused by specific 
restrictions in context of disaster management - as mentioned As mer 
above - where data acquisition has to be carried out also during Salem a 
night time and poor weather conditions. On the other hand the Wa dO: 
potential as well as the limitations of analysing airborne lasersca 
laserscanning data should be investigated. efe m 
were in 
For this approach data of TopoSys II sensor in raster format Karlsrul 
(grid size=1.0m) for two different test areas are used, Karlsruhe and veg 
(urban environment, flat terrain, size: approx. 2km x 2km) and occurs ¢ 
Salem - near Lake Constance (rural environment, hilly terrain, 
size: approx. 2km x Ikm). Both areas were captured in first and 32 Seg 
last pulse mode while for test site Salem additionally laser Althous 
intensity was registered. Figure 1 and 2 show an subset of these used : 
test sites. Salem data set was used by kindly permission ol RN 
TopoSys (Germany). other w 
408
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.