Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

  
  
SEMI-AUTOMATED CSG MODEL-BASED BUILDING EXTRACTION FROM 
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC IMAGES 
S. D. Wang“, Y. H. Tseng ^ 
Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 University Road, Tainan 70101, TAIWAN 
2 Bh. D. Candidate, TEL: +886-6-2370876 ext.852, FAX: +886-6-2375764, E-Mail: sendo@sv.ncku.edu.tw 
° Professor, TEL: +886-6-2757575 ext. 63835, FAX: +886-6-2375764, E-Mail: tseng@mail.ncku.cdu.tw 
Commission III, WG III/4 
KEY WORDS: Digital, Photogrammetry, Semi-automation, Building, Extraction, Three-dimensional, Modelling, Measurement 
ABSTRACT: 
Using pre-defined models to extract spatial information of the building, called model-based building extraction, has been considered 
as a convincible approach to improve the existing photogrammetric techniques. However, there is still a bottleneck on the practical 
efficiency and accuracy. This paper proposed a semi-automated approach to extracting buildings from multiple aerial images as well 
as close-range images by a tailored least-squares model-image fitting (LSMIF) algorithm. Compare to the floating mark which is 
used by conventional photogrammetric techniques, we proposed a naval measuring tool of “floating models” for building extraction. 
The floating model is an abstract representation of the real object, which can be a point, a line segment, a surface plane, or a 
volumetric model. Each floating model is associated with a set of pose parameters and a set of shape parameters. By fitting the 
model to images, these parameters will not only reveal the location of the building but also describe the shape of the building. The 
semi-automated strategy for building extraction includes following five steps: (1) manually select an appropriate model, (2) 
manually locate and adjust the model for approximate fitting, (3) automatically compute the optimal fittin 
compose the fitted models according to the Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG). An ad hoc computer program which was developed 
to implementing the proposed semi-automated approach was tested by extracting 10 selected buildings around the NCKU campus. 
The accuracy achieved was evaluated by comparing the roof corner coordinates with manual measurements. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
In response to the development of 3D City Spatial Information 
Systems for urban planning and management, acquisition of 3D 
data of city objects has increasingly become an important topic. 
This tendency leads to intense research activities aiming for 
automated or semi-automated building extraction from digital 
aerial images in both the photogrammetry and the computer 
vision communities (Mohan and Nevatia, 1989, Braun et al, 
1995, Englert and Gülch, 1996, Lang and Forstner, 1996, 
Vosselman and Veldhuis, 1999, Grün, 2000). While the task of 
building extraction may differ in terms of image data type and 
scale, object complexity, required level of detail, and type of 
product, the common process sequence would be: detection, 
reconstruction, and attribution. Various approaches have been 
implemented with emphasis on more or less automation with 
respect to the process sequence. 
Conventional photogrammetry concentrates on the accurate 3D 
coordinate measurement of points. The automated measuring 
systems set up by image matching algorithms are still based on 
the point-to-point correspondence. However, linear feature 
contains more geometric and semantic information than point. It 
is also casier to be extracted from the photogrammetric images. 
Since the last decade, scholars and experts have been exploring 
the methods that linear feature takes place of point for solving 
photogrammetric problems (Schenk ef al., 1991, Li and Zhou, 
1994). The researches show that linear features can be used to 
determine image orientation by space resection (Petsa and 
Patias, 1995, van den Heuvel, 1997, Kerschner, 1998, Hrabacek 
and van den Heuvel, 2000, Smith and Park, 2000), or to 
measure object by model-image fitting (Vosselman and 
Haralick, 1996, van den Heuvel, 1999, van den Heuvel, 2000, 
Heuel and Forstner, 2001, Zhou and Li, 2001). These 
innovative researches lead the photogrammetric technology to a 
new stage which is called “Line Photogrammetry”. 
Although the CAD system is not initially developed for 
photogrammetric purpose, its powerful functions of drawing, 
manipulating, and visualizing 2D objects have made it being 
widely used with photogrammetric systems. The increasing 
demands of object’s 3D models encourage many researches 
toward using 3D CAD models as a modelling tool to extracting 
objects from image data (Das ef al., 1997, Ermes et al., 1999, 
Boehm et al., 2000, van den Heuvel, 2000, Tseng and Wang, 
2002). This trend towards integration of photogrammetry and 
CAD system in the algorithmic aspect creates a new term: 
"CAD-based Photogrammetry”. Researches show that using 
CAD models does increase the efficiency of photogrammetric 
modelling by two reasons: (1) the advanced object modelling 
techniques such as Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG), (2) the 
incorporation of geometric object constraints. 
Inspired by the line photogrammetry and CAD-based 
photogrammetry, we proposed a naval measuring tool — floating 
model — in this paper. The floating model represents a flexible 
entity floating in the 3D space. It can be a point, a line segment, 
a surface plane, or a volumetric model. Each model is 
associated with a set of shape parameters and a set of pose 
parameters. The pose parameters determine the datum point's 
position and the rotation of the model. The shape parameters 
g, (4) manually edit, and (5) 
    
    
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
   
   
   
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
     
    
    
     
    
       
   
   
    
    
   
      
    
    
   
    
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
Interne 
change 
traditic 
an exte 
in the 
object. 
floatin, 
any sh: 
the ne 
Compe 
models 
CSG 1 
whole 
primiti 
which 
the sha 
numbe 
These 
modell 
descrit 
schem 
many | 
1998, . 
floatin 
of floa 
by a cc 
Model 
Vossel 
2000, 
starts 
specifi 
betwee 
model- 
semi-a 
problei 
operat 
when 1 
key is 
param. 
wire-fi 
coincic 
the ir 
param. 
proces 
least-si 
major 
The pi 
The b: 
compu 
such a 
operat; 
While 
optima 
  
Figure 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.