International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
The different items of PLP-CAM have to be synchronized
exactly, because each systems works independently. The block
chart in Figure 2 shows the approach. Using event markers
solves the problem by generating time stamps. These markers
are stored by POS and combine a measurement event with
absolute GPS-time (e.g. starting a scanning line).
3D-LS
POS
GPS ANTENNA
mo
æ Ivent Marker2 m 7
A
Ivent Marker 1
Figure 2. Synchronization
3. FUSION OF M1 AND 3D-LS DATA
To investigate the fusion of panoramic and laser data first
experiments were carry out in a laboratory environment. Here,
only the panoramic camera M2 and 3D-LS were used.
3.1 Experimental Set-up
In order to study the problems arising by fusion of data sets of
the panoramic camera and the 3D-LS, both instruments took an
image of a special prepared scene, which were covered with
well-defined control points. The panoramic camera was
mounted on a tripod. After recording completion the camera
was dismounted and 3D-LS was mounted on the tripod without
changing the tripod's position. 3D-LS was used in the imaging
mode scanning a field of view (FOV) of 40? x 26? comprising
1600 x 1000 pixels. Each pixel is described by the quadruple
Cartesian coordinates plus intensity (x, y, z, I). The M2-image
covered a FOV of approximately 30? x 60? with 5000 x10000
pixels.
Figure 3. Special prepared laboratory
508
66 control points. were available in a distance of 6 m. Lateral
resolution of laser and panoramic scanner is 3 mm and 1.05 mm
respectively, which is a suitable value for fusion of the data sets.
For the coordinate determination of the signalised points an
independent approach was done. Using image data from a DCS
460 camera and bundle block adjustment program Australis.
The lateral accuracy of about 30 points is 0.5 mm and depth
accuracy about 3 mm.
Figure 4. PANCAM on tripod
3.2 Modeling and Calibration
Laser scanner and panoramic camera work with different
coordinate systems and must be adjust one to each other. The
laser scanner delivers Cartesian coordinates; where as M2 puts
out data in a typical photo image projection. Although, both
devices were mounted at the same position one had to regard
that the projection centre of both instruments were not located
exactly in the same position. Therefore a model of panoramic
imaging and a calibration with known target data is required.
X
Figure 4. Panoramic imaging (see text)
The imaging geometry of the panoramic camera is characterized
by the rotating CCD-line, assembled perpendicular to the x-y
plane and forming an image by rotation around the z-axis. The
modelling and calibration of panoramic cameras was
investigated and published recently (Schneider, 2002 & 2003,
Klette, 2001 & 2003).
For camera description and calibration we use the approach
shown in Figure 4. The CCD-line is placed in the focal plate
perpendicular to the z-axis and shifted with respect to the y'-Z
coordinate origin by (y's,z'o). The focal plate is mounted in the
camera at a distance x', which is suitable to the object geometry.
Inter
If th
foca
behi
ima,
coor
Toc
ima,
X IS
the «
pixe
rota
(yo*
(X-
To «
fied
late
The
a co
two
folk
geo
The
and
inve
and
oZ
Sk
©
The
can
For
and
rest
and
cor]
Thi
of!
sind