Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

Istanbul 2004 
\TION 
M generation 
in Geneva are 
uracy of the 
PC2 with 10 
30 m for both 
ation values. 
the national 
of objects is 
lgorithm was 
, 2004). Our 
' array image 
accommodate 
e Three-Line- 
and SPOT-5. 
ble results for 
generated by 
s, grid points 
relation and 
ted from the 
lines) at each 
1e subsequent 
ymputation of 
 (Multiphoto 
Gruen, 1985; 
| accuracy for 
images) and 
ies. Finally, a 
nal matching 
points. 
e GCPs cover 
vest, and then 
   
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
$3 WP dp. ii. IE - 
Figure 5. Edge matc 
  
Figure 6. Shaded 5m DSM generated from IKONOS. The city 
of Thun in the upper left seen from North-West. 
The procedure mainly contains the following characteristics: 
l) It is a combination of feature point, edge and grid point 
matching. The grid point matching procedure uses 
relaxation-based relational matching, and can bridge-over 
areas with no or little texture through local smoothness 
constraints. The matched edges are introduced to control 
the smoothness constraints in order to preserve the surface 
discontinuities. 
2) The adaptive determination of the matching parameters 
results in a higher success rate and less blunders. These 
parameters include the size of the matching window, the 
search distance and the threshold value for cross- 
correlation and MPGC. For instance, the procedure uses a 
smaller matching window, larger search distance and a 
smaller threshold value in rough terrain area and vice 
versa. The roughness of the terrain can be computed from 
the approximate DSM on a higher level of the image 
pyramid. 
3) Linear features are important for preserving the surface 
discontinuities. A robust edge matching algorithm, using 
the multi-image information and adaptive matching 
window determination through the analysis of the image 
content and local smoothness constraints along the edges, 
is combined into our procedure. One example of edge 
matching is shown in Fig. 5. 
4) Edges (in 3D) are introduced as breaklines when a TIN- 
based DSM is constructed. This DSM provides good 
approximations for matching in the next pyramid level. 
The computation of the approximate DSM in the highest 
pyramid level uses a matching algorithm based on the 
"region-growing" strategy (Otto and Chau, 1988), in 
827 
which the already measured GCPs and tie points can be 
used as "seed points". 
5) If more than two images are available, the MPGC 
procedure can use them simultaneously and matching 
results are more robust. Here, the resulting DSM from an 
image pair can be used as approximation for the MPGC 
procedure. 
6) Through the quality control procedure, e.g. using the local 
smoothness and consistency analysis of the intermediate 
DSM at each image pyramid, the analysis of the 
differences between the intermediate DSMs, and the 
analysis of the MPGC results, blunders can be detected and 
deleted. 
For each matched feature, a reliability indicator is assigned 
based on the analysis of the matching results from cross- 
correlation and MPGC. This indicator is used for assigning 
different weights for each measurement, which are used when a 
regular grid is interpolated. 
4.2 Test Results 
For Thun, we used for initial matching the images (and the 
respective triangulation results) of the triplet and stereopair 
separately and for the final MPGC all 5 images. The patch size 
varied from 7^ to 17^ for initial matching and was 11? for 
MPGC. Some areas like lakes and rivers were manually defined 
as "dead areas" via a user-friendly interface. A regular grid 
DSM with 5m spacing was interpolated from the raw 
measurements. Fig. 6 shows a visualisation of the generated 
DSM. In spite of smoothing due to the large area used in each 
point measurement, the discontinuities are quite well preserved. 
Tables 9 and 10 show the DSM accuracy results, without any 
manual editing. The results are evaluated based on the 
differences between the heights interpolated in the reference 
laser DSM at the planimetric position of the DSM from 
matching and the heights from matching. 
The tables show that the DSM accuracy is in the 1-5 m range, 
depending on the landcover and terrain type. A very high 
accuracy can be achieved in open areas. In these areas, more 
than 80% of the differences are less than 2 m. In urban and 
vegetation areas, the accuracy is worse, which is due to the fact 
that the reference LIDAR measurements and the parallaxes 
determined in matching refer to partly different objects. 
Matching measures higher than LIDAR at trees (in addition, at 
tress LIDAR sometimes measures below the tree tops) and 
narrow low-lying objects (like streets). Apart from that, the time 
difference between LIDAR and IKONOS data acquisition was 
3-4 years, and the triplet of IKONOS had snow, up to 2-3 m in 
the mountains. Other factors that influenced matching were the 
long shadows (sun elevation was just 19 deg), occlusions, espec. 
in the W-E mountains, very low textured snow areas (which 
were improved with our preprocessing) and the patch size used 
in matching which unavoidably leads to smoothing of abrupt 
surface discontinuities. The accuracy values deteriorate also due 
to the high bias (see mean values espec. in Table 9), while 
height accuracy also gets worse due to the suboptimal 
base/height ratio (see sensor elevation and azimuth in Table 1). 
Taking all above factors into account, it becomes clear that 
IKONOS has a very high geometric accuracy potential and with 
sophisticated matching algorithms a height accuracy of 0.5 m — 
| m can be achieved in open areas with cooperative texture. In 
fact in these areas, the matching accuracy was close to that of 
LIDAR. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.