Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

tanbul 2004 
al Dimensions 
2.950696 
2.881100 
2 915513 
2.915515 
2.948176 
2.933445 
2.935812 
2.949563 
  
t: IKONOS 
  
ect power 
ige fused by 
ge fused by 
rete wavelet 
let transform 
  
COMPARATIVE INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM SAR AND OPTICAL 
IMAGERY 
Peter Lohmann, Karsten Jacobsen, Kian. Pakzad, Andreas Koch 
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation (IPT) 
University of Hannover, Germany 
mailto:lohmann(gipi.uni-hannover.de 
Commission 111, WGIII/6 
KEY WORDS: Land cover, Image Interpretation, Radar, SAR, 
ABSTRACT: 
Presently EuroSDR, controlled by the Technical University of Berlin, is conducting a test on competitive information extraction 
from state of the art airborne multi-polarised SAR imagery (C, X and L — band) and high resolution optical imagery of the same area. 
The test envisages 3 stages, namely visual interpretation and map compilation, automatic object extraction and sensor fusion. Some 
first results are shown. : 
The interpretation results of three interpreters will be shown, two of them being skilled photogrammetric operators, the third having 
only limited experience with SAR images. All interpreters have been given a principal theoretical course on SAR specific imaging 
features and properties and training possibilities on a separate SAR scene together with map information which was not part of the 
test. 
A common interpretation and - for reasons of comparison - mapping key has been set up and on screen interpretation started using 
the SAR scenes only, before the optical imagery was interpreted. Object extraction was conducted for linear objects like roads, rail- 
ways or rivers and area objects like agricultural, forest or residential areas. In some limited areas also single buildings were extracted 
in order to show the full potential of the imagery. Both interpretations (SAR and optical) have been compared according to accuracy 
and completeness using the optical data as representative master because of missing reference data. Difficulties in identifying objects 
by the interpreters will be discussed and compared It can be shown, that in most cases the completeness and correctness of linear and 
area features as compared to the interpretation of optical data is satisfactory and that discrepancies between both interpretations may 
be explained. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
1l. INTRODUCTION optical images are used as reference. However each of the 3 
interpreters used his own interpretation of the optical data as 
Within an EuroSDR contest, organised by the Technical Uni- his own reference. 
versity of Berlin, a competitive information extraction is per- 
formed on both, state of the art airborne multi-polarized SAR Region Landscape Content 
imagery (sce Table 1) and high resolution optical imagery of Trudering Fairgrounds 
different tercain types: Oberpfaffenhofen Agriculture & Industry 
Region A | Polarisation | Resolution Copenhagen Residential & Industry 
Trudering X | none : om Fjordhundra Agriculture & Fons 
Oberpfaffenhofen | L lexicographic | 3.0m Table 2: Test sites and their characteristics 
Copenhagen C | Pauli 40m The 4 test sites (see Table 2) show a different terrain struc- 
Fjordhundra C | Pauli 4.0m ture in terms of landscape contents, ranging from agricultural 
Table 1: SAR images used for the different test areas to rural and industrial. 
Two of the interpreters do have a long year experience in in- 
The used data sets are described in detail by Hellwich et al. terpretation of aerial photographs but not with SAR images. 
2002. The true-colour optical data available for each arca 
was resampled to the pixel size of the corresponding SAR 
images. The optical images have been acquired at different 
dates than the SAR data, however the exact acquisition times 
were not provided. 
The test is foreseen for three stages namely: 
- visual interpretation 
- A automatic object extraction and 
- extraction from sensor fused data 
This paper will show some first results of the first stage, in 
which visual interpretation by on-screen digitizing had been 
performed. The interpretation achieved with the SAR images 
will be compared with the results based on optical images. 
Topographic maps have not been available, by this reason the 
2. INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE 
As has been previously shown by Albertz (1970) and Schnei- 
der (1974) the quality of image interpretation is very much 
affected by the experience of the interpreters (Fig. 1). This is 
especially true for SAR image interpretation because of to- 
tally different imaging characteristics. 
Because of missing experience with interpretation of SAR 
images the interpreters were trained for the specialities of 
SAR by using a tutorial of CCRS and multifrequency SAR 
images together with topographic maps of an area not being 
part of this contest. 
535 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.