Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

inbul 2004 
tories 
from the 
ries. This 
t and can 
number of 
ghts of the 
coordinate 
ce oriented 
‘his allows 
> not place 
tion is to 
:cise floor. 
balconies, 
nts, it has 
is defined 
t, the only 
ch vertical 
A 
SE ISAT ns SR 
—— à 
  
em 
ges 
eed with a 
a point on 
tage. Here 
the recess 
tes. In this 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
  
way, the tool detect automatically the associated floor (with the 
Y-component), then it subdivide the floor vertically into three 
parts according to the X1 and X2 coordinates. 
  
  
  
f À 
7 Í 1 1 7 
f i i 1 
f e b pd 
; pend L A 
t 0 ir "a 
Pena le Mi | 
Ih b - fan An 
x n 
E rere ah Tres 
  
  
  
Figure 9. Vertical subdividing of a floor 
This cutting is displayed for control and the limits are registered 
into the database. 
In the case of the upper right image in the Figure 8 we can 
proceed in the same manner for each floor concerned by the 
recess. 
4.5.3 Limitation of the process : All observably 
phenomenons on a frontage are not valid for the whole floor 
height and some of them present a more complex geometry. It's 
the case of the porch shown in Figure 8, lower left image. It can 
be of interest to extend our tool with polyline subdividing 
fonctionalities. 
4.5.4 Information on subdivided parts : The second tool 
offers the possibility to assign thematic informations to each 
subdivided part. 
  
Etape 1 | Etape 2 | Etape 3 | Etape 4 Etapes |» | 
Destination et Extrusion 
X: 4,23 Y: 6,91 Etage : 2-2 | 
| 
Largeur du décrochement | | 
i 
Destination :| habitation | 
Etage 0 :[c]à 
Etage 1 :[b]O 
Etage 2 :[h]0 [h]1,20 [h]0 
Etage 3 :[h]O [h]1,20 [h]O 
Etage 4 :[h]o [h]1,20 [h]o 
Etage 5 :[h]0 [h]1,20 [h]0 
Etage 6 :[h]0 [h]1,20 [h]0 
Supprimer Tout | 
Visualisation | 
  
  
Accepter | 
  
  
  
Figure 10. Interface for subdividing a frontage 
For instance, when a recess has to be described, it is important 
to indicate its position onto the frontage but its depth is also 
important. The value of the depth cannot be measured precisely 
with our system because the measurement are only accurate if 
done in the plane of the frontage. A solution is given by 
complementary terrain data that can notice how important the 
depth is. On the photography the depth can only be rougthly 
evaluated. 
Another information like the assignement of the frontage part 
can also been added. This information can directly derive from 
the photo-interpretation or stemmed from other documents or 
data. 
551 
The example shown in the Figure 10 illustrates a 1.20 meter 
recess in the center of the frontage localized on the floors 2 to 6. 
The two first floors contain only one part. 
The depth and the destination of the different parts are only 
example of information that it is possible to assign at this step 
of the process. 
Observations are following ones : 
- the depth can also be defined by a negativ value in the case of 
an entering part in the frontage. 
- it is possible to add an "empty" value for the destination of the 
different parts in the case of a hole crossing entirely the 
frontage (porch). 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 11. Different possibilities of subdividing a frontage 
4.6 Texture mapping 
4.6.1 Textures : The addition of textures allows a more 
natural comprehension of the 3D model and of the GIS derived. 
For these reasons it seems to be very useful to add some 
fonctionalities for frontage texture mapping. 
The definition of the texture can be obtained from sample 
materials or for more realistic rendering from the rectified 
image of the frontage derived from the second step tools. 
4.6.2 Texture images : The aim of this last process is to cut 
out from the rectified image of the whole frontage all the 
texture- images corresponding to each subdivided part. 
5. EXPERIMENTATION 
5.1 Initial 3D model 
For the illustration of the experimentations we use a part of a 
3D model plotted and reconstructed accordingly to the methods 
described in the part 2 of this paper. The initial model is not 
very accurate (1 meter). The rooftop details where not plotted in 
this case. The Figure 12 shows a boundary representation of the 
defined sample. 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 12. Boundary representation of the defined sample 
model 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.