Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

      
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
    
   
  
  
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
    
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
  
   
   
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
t B3. Istanbul 2004 
given V and A, 
tory, we follow a 
: curves, but now 
ce. Hence, in each 
ery pixel in A and 
sponding segment 
1e correspondence 
ited line segment is 
eration. 
rm curves is based 
le previous section. 
ever. As has been 
been developed for 
erivatives. Clearly, 
singularities at the 
ne of the equations 
derivatives cag) be 
w to address these 
way to circumvent 
parameter / at the 
corresponding line 
oree of freedom to 
rection is removed. 
re the object space 
thus reducing the 
h a vertex. For the 
is recommended to 
ighborhood of the 
. cubic spline, to 
yw us to employ the 
section without any 
WORK 
ry results from an 
ion of airborne and 
ng feature-based 
ilar, ERS-2 and 
ome airborne SAR 
For each particular 
ll be examined with 
lable, their shape as 
on) within the SAR 
o the problem of 
SAR images, our 
¢ accurate estimates 
tors, being a crucial 
tforms often being 
/ielding non-smooth 
Obtaining the same 
ould either require 
ng and navigation 
ense distribution of 
ctically impossible 
and reported herein 
: has provided the 
s for orienting and 
] by doing that has 
'rocessing. 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
REFERENCES 
Curlander, J., 1982. Location of Space borne SAR Imagery. 
IEEE Transactions on GeoScience and Remote Sensing, 20(3), 
pp. 359-364. 
Forstner, W., 2000. New Orientation Procedures. In 
International Achieves of Photogrammetry and Remore 
Sensing, 33 (B3), 297-304. 
Goncalves, J., and Dowman, I., 2002. Precise orientation of 
Spot Panchromatic with Tie Points to a SAR image. In 
Photogrammetric Computer Vision, Graz. 
Habib, A., and Kelley D., 2001. Single-Photo Resection Using 
the Modified Hough Transform. Photogrammetry Engineering 
and Remote Sensing. 67(8), pp 909-914. 
Kubik, K., Relative and Absolute Orientation Based on Linear 
Features. 1988. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote 
Sensing Vol. 46, pp. 199-204. 
Lee, C., Thesis, H. J., Bethel, J. S., and Mikhail, E. D., 2000. 
Rigorous Mathematical Modeling of Airborne Pushbroom 
Imaging Systems. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote 
Sensing, 66(4), pp. 385-392. 
Li, H., Manjunath, B., Mitra, S, 1995. A Contour-Based 
Approach to Multisensor Image Registration. In IEEE 
transactions on image processing, 4(3), pp. 320-334. 
Mikhail, E., 1993. Linear features for photogrammetric 
restitution and object completion. Integrating Photogrammetric 
Techniques with Scene Analysis and Machine Vision, SPIE 
Proc. No. 1944, pages 16-30, Orlando, FL. 
Mikhail, E., Bethel, J., and McGlone, J., 2001. Introduction to 
Modern Photogrammetry. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 318-322. 
Mohr, J., and Madsen, S., 2001. Geometric Calibration of ERS 
satellite SAR images. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and 
Remote Sensing, 39 (43) 842-850. 
Schenk, A., 2004. From point-based to feature-based aerial 
triangulation. /SPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote 
Sensing to appear. 
Zalmanson, H.G., 2000. Hierarchical Recovery of Exterior 
Orientation from Parametric and Natural 3-D Curves. IAPRS 
Vol. XXXIII, Amsterdam.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.