International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
REN TUT
Figure 3. Non-standard configuration of the block
Table 1
3 Flight
Block Camera Flight Focal Strips Photos Breaks d
number scale distance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
] LMK 12800 152.440 12 233 + W-E
2 RC-30 4300 305.117 3 24 - W-E
3 LMK 9500 152.440 35 322 + W-E
4 LMK 6000 153.478 3 19 - S-N
5 RMK-TOP 10000 153.619 2 16 - S-N
6 RMK 20000 152.850 29 395 + N-S
The special feature of second block was numerous forest
areas. GCPs were well distributed but measurement was quite
difficult due to the forest areas.
Third block (Picture 3) has very complex configuration
including several breaks. Ground control points and
projection centers were used for adjustment. Although the
block was computed successfully it is recommended to make
deep analysis before deciding to use any non-standard
configured blocks.
656
Small fourth block located in mountain area where ratio of
terrain height to flight height reached 0.15.
Block number five is covered a flat area were maximum
height difference is just 7 meters.
Adjustment results are shown in table 2. It estimates blocks”
accuracy by residuals of co-linearity on ground and
photogrammetric points.
Inter
Bloc]
than
As sl
gives
meas
10. €
The
many
produ
excee
less tl
Devel
proce.
the ac
Real-{
adjust
adjust
Refer
1. Zot
points
[APR!
Austri
2. Nel
tools f
Paper
Istanbı
3. Ne
collect
mappit
IV, An
4. Ant
Oleyni
time. I