tanbul 2004
otated with
s with 70
hat the first
he training
de 1 (m=1)
e (v=1.03),
th variance
on together
\ space are
ering
im"
—————
omatically
automatic
he method
direction,
Minimum
ures where
ol points
n Success
nodes that
ve method
daries and
t of our
d to high-
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
References
Baumberg A., Hogg D., 1994. Learning Flexible Models from
Image Sequences. Proc. Third European Conf. Computer
Vision, pp. 299-308.
Cootes T., Taylor C., Cooper D., and Graham J, 1995. Active
shape models - their training and application. Computer
Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1): pp. 38-59.
Cootes T., et. al, 1992. Active Shape Models —'smart snakes '.
In D C Hogg and R D Boyle, editors, Proceedings of the
British Machine Vision Conference, Leeds, UK, pp. 266-275.
Davies R., et. al. 2002. A Minimum Description Length
Approach to Statistical Shape Modeling. IEEE Trans Med.
Imaging, vol. 21, pp. 525-537.
Dryden L., and Mardia K., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis.
John Wiley & Sons.
Hamrneh G., ef. al., 1998. Active Shape Models: Modelling
Shape and Gray Level Variation. Swedish Symposium on
[mage Analysis, SSAB 1998, pp. 125-128.
Hicks Y. ef. al., 2002. Automatic Landmarking for Building
Biological Shape Models. Int. Conf. Image Processing,
Rochester, USA, vol. 2, pp. 801-804.
Hill A. et. al., 2000. A Framework for Automatic Landmark
Identification Using a New Method of Nonrigid
Correspondence. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell.,
vol. 22, pp. 241-251.
Kass et. al. 1987b. Snakes: Active Contours Models. In 1
International Conference on Computer Vision, London,
England, pp. 259-268, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
Sklansky J., et. al., 1972. “Minimum Perimeter Polygons of
Digitized Silhouettes”. IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. €-21, no. 3,
pp. 260-268.
Walter M., 2002. Automatic Model Acquisition and
Recognition of Human Gestures. PhD Thesis, University of
Westminster, London.
753
