Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

bul 2004 
s in the 
ught to 
nt eg, 
-grazing 
| various 
nges in 
ng and 
data in 
sses and 
e area, 
llow the 
ynmental 
egies of 
= 
^ 
satellite 
and its 
' remote 
images, 
it 2) and 
sat 4). 
Facility 
2/35 and 
led from 
bove). 
path 172, 
Acquired 
image, 
9. 4788 , 
sat Ltd. 
1967 and 
38-2 and 
»resented 
satellites. 
one, the 
onboard 
| (MSS), 
Mapper 
rs which 
'nces are 
esolution 
h spatial 
>]. There 
e end of 
e size i$ 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
considerably less than with Landsat. Also the radiometric 
resolution is higher than before (DigitalGlobe, 2004). 
The CORONA satellites, used 1960 — 1972, were the first 
generation of US reconnaissance satellites and they took stereo 
photos using two oblique viewing panoramic cameras. One 
photo is a panchromatic film strip of 7 x 90 cm. The best spatial 
resolution is 1.83 m for the KH-4B mission at a flight height of 
150 km. The SYGIS project has utilized photographs from the 
KH-4A mission, the size of the photos being 2.25 x 29.8 inch 
and the resolution 2.7 m  (www.earthexplorer.usgs.gov). 
Geometric correction of the CORONA images is very difficult 
due to the lack of information about the principal point and 
fiducial marks, and panoramic distortions (Altmaier - Kany, 
2002). 
3.2 Digital elevation model 
A digital elevation model (DEM) covered part of the study area 
and its data sources were SRTM-DEM and ASTER-DEM. The 
DEM was used to remove shadow areas from satellite image 
interpretation results and to make 3-dimensional visualizations 
(still images and flight movies) of the ground. 
3.2.1 SRTM-DEM: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 
(SRTM) provides a DEM at resolution levels of 30 and 90 m 
covering the earth between latitudes 60N and 57S measured in 
February 2000. The DEM is constructed using synthetic 
aperture radar (SAR) interferometry, meaning that two radar 
images have been taken from slightly different positions and the 
surface height is determined using phase differences between 
images. The DEM was measured using two frequencies (C- and 
X-bands). X-band data was used in this study. The drawback is 
that the swath width is 45 km, meaning that there are gaps 
between neighboring orbits. WGS84 is used as horizontal and 
vertical datum. This means that ellipsoidal heights are provided. 
The vertical accuracy should be better than 16 m absolute and 6 
m relative, and <the horizontal accuracy better than 20 m 
(Rabus et al., 2003). The SRTM-DEM was provided by DLR 
(The German Aero-Space Center) to SYGIS (the Finnish project 
in question) as a project member of the DLR project. 
3.2.2 ASTER-DEM: ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal 
Emission and Reflection radiometer) is a multispectral imager 
which was launched onboard Terra satellite in 1999. ASTER 
has 14 spectral bands from visible to thermal infrared region 
and their spatial resolution varies from 15 m to 90 m. There is 
also one telescope looking backward in the near infrared region 
(channel 3B, 0.78 — 0.86 um, spatial resolution 15m) to give 
stereoscopic capability in the along-track direction. Digital 
elevation model generation algorithm uses only instrument and 
satellite ephemeris data. The geodetic map projection is WGS84 
and pixel spacing 30m. The horizontal and vertical accuracy 
should be better than 50m and 15m, respectively (ASTER, 
2002). Two ASTER-DEMSs were acquired through NASA Earth 
Observing System Data Gateway 
(http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome/). 
3.2.3 Matching of the SRTM- and ASTER-DEMs: SRTM- 
DEM covered only part of the study area so it was decided to 
augment the DEM by ASTER-DEM. The coverage of DEMs 
can be seen in Figure 2., red represents the coverage of SRTM- 
DEM and green and blue that of ASTER-DEMs. Because the 
heights of SRTM-DEM are from the surface of ellipsod WGS84 
(Rabus et al., 2003) and the heights of ASTER-DEM were 
relative, there was a need to study the heights of different DEMs 
more carefully. 
899 
Compared to STRM-DEM, the heights of ASTER-DEM 1 (the 
light green small triangle visible on the top in Figure 2) were 
46.9 m lower and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) between 
DEMs was 48.5 m. The heights of ASTER-DEM 2 (the darker 
blue small triangle visible below in Figure 2) were 22.8 m lower 
than SRTM-DEM and RMSE was 27.0 m. 
Figure 2. The study area and the coverage of DEMs, the largest 
red area represents the coverage of SRTM-DEM and the green 
above and the blue beneath ASTER-DEMs. Data copyright 
DLR and Eurimage. 
  
  
  
It was decided to adjust the ASTER-DEMs to STRM-DEM. 
After removing the average difference between DEMs, it was 
noticed that the slope of the linear regression equation between 
SRTM and ASTER-DEMs were not equal to |, meaning that 
there was scaling factor in the ASTER-DEMs which needed to 
be removed. Therefore the adjustment of ASTER-DEMs were 
based on the regression equations between SRTM- and ASTER- 
DEMs. The correlation between dems were high, the correlation 
coefficients were 0.9855 for ASTER-DEM 1 and 0.9952 
ASTER-DEM 2. After the adjustment, the RMSE between 
SRTM-DEM and ASTER-DEM 1 was 7.8 m and ASTER-DEM 
2 10.6 m. 
3.3 Georeferencing 
The georeferencing of satellite images and digital elevation 
models was performed by choosing the panchromatic channel of 
Landsat ETM image as a master image and georeferencing 
other images and DEMs to that master image using ground 
control points. The master image was georeferenced using 
ground control points measured from UK military aviation 
maps (TPC G-4C, TPC G-4D, Scale: 1: 500 000, UK 1998). 
Other images were georeferenced using an ETM-image. 20 - 30 
ground control points were determined from images and first 
degree polynomial transformation and nearest neighbor 
interpolation was used in each case. The root mean square 
errors were less than one pixel. The CORONA images were not 
georefenced due to the previously mentioned difficult imaging 
geometry. 
The effect of georeferencing was studied by comparing the 
georefenced images using orbital information and the 
georeferenced images using ground control points. The corners 
of the images were measured and errors computed between the 
mean coordinates. Errors in east and north directions were 
defined as the ETM-coordinate minus the corresponding 
coordinate from other image and planimetric error is length of 
error vector. Table 2 represents the results. The results indicate 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.