International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004
fmi cap PERLE (ER EN n
1
a rentum 2
—————————a!
UNS
Be
Figure 7. Build-up Situation of Historic Peninsula in 1929 and
2000.
In Historic Peninsula the neighborhoods on the coastal side of
the district preserves their historic pattern from 1929 till 2000.
After 1939 the density of the build-up space expanded from
north to south direction and after the year 1970 a distinctive
increase observed in all neighborhoods.
3.5. Physical Quality of Buildings
In this analysis the physical quality of buildings are evaluated
by using Multi Criteria. Decision (MCD) with respect to the
criterion. of building construction coefficient value (building
land area/building area*number of stories), number of stories
and physical condition of buildings. MCD is determined by
assigning subjective points to the criterion expressed above.
Iterated values in the neighborhood of building construction
coefficient and building number of stories are accepted as
represented values of the neighborhood. In this concept
weighted points are assigned to building construction
coefficient value and number of stories criterions with respect to
the values differentiate from the represented character in the
neighborhood.
The intensity of the physical quality of buildings is evaluated in
neighborhood scale and the geographic relations of those similar
or dissimilar values are expressed. These evaluations guide the
planners and decision makers to set the priority of the
neighborhoods to construct conservation and development
plans. For every single building, the criterions listed above are
evaluated to construct MCD and those obtained values are
expressed in the scale of neighborhood.
First of all for the physical case of the building criterion;
historic buildings are assigned high to low points by means of
their physical case. — Although the condition of an historic
building is poor it is assigned points because of the potential of
carrying historic value and chance of probability to improve
with appropriate restoration intervention. For non-historic
buildings only the ones having good conditions get points for
that criterion.
Second stage is the number of stories criterion. In this stage
firstly the most repeated number of stories of historic buildings
for neighborhoods are calculated and accepted as representing
value of that neighborhood. Then for every single building
criterion points are assigned with respect to the represented
value of the neighborhood. Both for historic and non-historic
buildings having lower or equal to represented value of number
of stories get high and others get low points.
Building construction coefficient give us a way to understand
the construction pattern of the neighborhood so, third step of the
evaluation is to find out the most repeated building construction
coefficient for historic buildings and it is accepted as
represented building construction coefficient for neighborhood.
And higher points are assigned to the buildings having same or
918
less regarding to the represented building construction
coefficient value and the others get lower points for both
historic and non-historic buildings.
Physical Quality of Buildings
Figure 8. Physical Quality of Buildings
The following stage is to get the average of the assigned points
for those four categories for all buildings and total building
physical quality points are obtained in a subjective manner by
using MCD.
In the resulting map, places nearby Istiklal Street and northern
parts of Beyoglu district have higher points by means of
physical quality. For Historic Peninsula, a more complex
situation is observed, coastal areas of that district, central
business districts (CBD) of Fatih and Eminónü have relatively
higher points.
3.6. Resulting Analysis
All the results of the analyses explained above are overlaid and
a resulting map is obtained. In this analysis again a MCD is
applied by using the percentage of historic buildings, ratio
between historic buildings floor area and total area, ratio
between historic and non-historic building floor areas; ratio
between historic and non-historic building construction areas;
change in the build-up space and physical quality of buildings
analyses. In this concept weight points are assigned to the
results of analyses listed above and a resulting map representing
the general trend is obtained.
Depending on the results of this analysis it is possible to
conclude which neighborhood has historic value; how much
affected from the structural change in time interval and beyond
those entire criterion in which case the buildings’ conditions
are.
In a historic urban pattern expressing more than one criterion
like percentage of historic buildings, density and expansion of
historic buildings construction area, percentage of the change in
time and buildings physical case; would assist us to determine
planning and design stages and to understand the typical
characteristics of the pattern to develop appropriate planning
studies. Together with all those, geographic distribution of
similar and dissimilar neighborhoods are clarified in terms of
planning concepts in the resulting map
In order to perform this analysis using MCD; the analyses listed
above are used to assign appropriate points to the results of
those analyses. In percentage of historic buildings analysis
which shows the density of historic buildings; the higher valued