Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 3)

Comparative study of fixation identification algorithms 
(Salvucci and Goldberg, 2002) suggests dispersion-threshold 
method as a fast and robust mechanism for identification of 
fixations. This method is also quite reliable in applications, 
requiring real time data analysis, which is a critical aspect in 
real-time photogrammetry applications. 
Table 1 illustrates impact of camera resolution and sampling 
rate on accuracy of fixation identification. The source data have 
been acquired by eye-tracking systems with CCD size 
1280x1024 pixels at 250 frames per second and spatially and 
temporally down-sampled. Identification of fixations have been 
implemented using Dispersion-Threshold Identification (I-DT) 
with the fixation duration threshold of 250 ms and the 
dispersion threshold of 25 pixels, constant for all resolutions 
and sample rates in our experiments. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Sample Fixation RMISE : Neof 
interval, | duration n Velocity : Fomples 
E d 2 ms ; coord, pix/sec in 
pix fixations 
Sample rate: 250 frames per second 
1280x 1024 4 324,6 2,85 198,7 81,1 
960x768 4 328,0 2,86 215,6 82,0 
728x582 4 326,5 2,99 227,7 81,6 
500x576 4 327,4 3,00 222,2 81,8 
360x288 4 340,2 3,32 233,1 85,1 
CCD size: 1280x1024 
250 fps 4 324,6 2,85 198,7 81,1 
125 fps 8 334,7 3,00 166,8 41,8 
050 fps 20 339,9 3,64 113,5 17,0 
025 fps 40 350,5 5.51 75,9 8,8 
010 fps 100 331.3 15,48 22,8 3,6 
CCD size and sample rate 
o 3206 | 2,85 | 1987 | s 
NC 8 3308. [- 304-1752 | 414 
m | 20 | 3348 83,21 | 1212 [16,7 
EE 29951 338 [150004237 3,6 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 1. Impact of camera resolution and sampling rate on 
accuracy of fixation identification 
Among many parameters which could be extracted and studied 
from eye movement protocols, coordinates and duration of 
fixations have major interests for accurate measurements of 
objects on static images. Table 1 represents sample interval 
(i.e. video frames acquisition interval), duration of identified 
fixation (i.e. time of relatively stable position of an eye), errors 
in determining of coordinates of fixation, mean velocity of eye 
tremors and drifts during fixations and average number of 
samples in fixations. 
Table 1 illustrates variation of the above parameters depending 
on camera resolution, sample rate (frequency) and their 
combinations. As the coordinates of objects have the highest 
priority in metric technologies, the corresponding parameter 
(RMSE of fixations’ position) has drawn our major attention. 
The first part of the table illustrates the idea that temporal 
resolution has major priority over spatial resolution in eye- 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B3. Istanbul 2004 
tracking systems, aimed on measurements of static objects. The 
results clearly show that change of spatial resolution from 
1280x1024 pixels down to 360x288 pixels does not entail 
coarsening of fixation coordinates on such a dramatic scale: 
RMSE in coordinates change from 2.85 pixels to 3.32 pixels 
only. 
The second part of the table (opposite), illustrates significant 
loss of accuracy in coordinates when changing sampling rate at 
fixed spatial resolution (from 2.85 pixels at 250 frames per 
second to 15.48 pixels at 10 frames per second). The third part 
of the table demonstrates impact of combined changes — both 
spatial and temporal resolution, outlining the balance between 
spatial resolution and sampling rate of eye-tracker's CCD and 
frame grabber. 
The data, provided in Table I, are averaged from series of 
experiments with eye-tracking protocols. Figures 4 and 5 
illustrate particular data analysis — matching of fixations, 
identified from different source data. 
  
  
  
  
DP memset bettie EN 
* | 
4 i 
900 - + | 
¥ | 
850 4 5 Sulit, 
- : + 
5 
ann T T T i 
450 S00 550 600 650 
+1280 640 © mismatch 1250 « mismatch Q640 
  
  
Figure 3. Fixation matching results; blue - fixations detected at 
1280x1024/250fps, green - fixations detected at 
640x480/50fps; red — fixation mismatches 
  
  
  
500 A, AERO 
500 + | 
400 4 ne | | | | 
W H A My . A 1 | À 
an VÀ wx. LA |o 
300 W Uu M { Li AM A | | \ i j | AN | X 
200 + Lib Tl | 
100] 4 LM HT 
nd T LET TERT T 
1 21 41 61 
Duration Deviation Position Deviation 
  
  
  
  
Figure 4. Fixation matching results 1280x1024/250fps vs. 
640x480/50fps: blue - deviations in duration of 
fixations (ms); purple — deviations in coordinates of 
fixations (pixels) 
6. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK: EYE-TRACKING 
IN AUGMENTED PHOTOGRAMMETRY 
Spatial and temporal data about eye movements, compiled 
while observing geospatial imagery, bear the meaningful 
    
     
      
   
    
     
   
   
   
    
   
   
    
    
    
    
   
    
    
   
       
   
    
     
     
       
    
    
   
    
  
  
  
   
   
     
    
      
  
     
     
   
  
   
  
  
    
   
    
  
   
    
   
   
   
    
Intern 
—— 
inforn 
augm 
Fixati 
interp 
being 
tracki 
new t 
abilit 
highly 
Regis 
explo 
throu 
mind 
whicl 
image 
about 
of sc 
surro 
level 
inter] 
scene 
devel 
know 
huma 
imag: 
and r 
geosp 
revol 
know 
Azun 
Dyna 
SIGC 
Grap 
Carp 
Corn 
Cricl 
com 
Nati 
Deer 
Proc 
In Ce 
Ditcl 
Rese 
Doer 
Visu 
Perf 
Gold 
proci 
1955 
Jaim 
S.-F. 
Auto
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.