Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 4)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B4. Istanbul 2004 
(2) Graphic Generalization 
Constraint 9 and 10 describe requirements and specifications of 
the objective soil map. They are involved in the phrase of 
preparation and preprocess, but also steer the solution of 
graphic generalization. Take the solution for solving conflicts 
caused by soil parcels smaller than the minimal area as example. 
For Constraint 9, the sequence of appropriate operations for the 
conflicts is enlargement, aggregation, amalgamation, collapse; 
but for constraint 10, amalgamation, collapse is more 
appropriate in terms of the efficiency of implementation. The 
generic constraints govern the implementation of these 
operators. For example, minimum size and self-intersection are 
used to avoid invalid or incorrect geometric conflicts; shape/ 
angularity, size ratio, alignment/pattern and neighborhood 
relations work for preserving the properties of soil distribution. 
(3) Quality Evaluation 
The generic and thematic constraints are used as the standards 
in the evaluation of generalization results. The thematic 
constraints mainly evaluate the quality of the result map from a 
macro view of point, whereas the generic constraints focus on 
the detailed aspects of geometric graphics. 
= … Preparation and Preprocess 
  
Thematic Constraints Generic Constraints 
  
Constraint 1, Constraint 2 Minimum size, 
Constraint 3, Constraint 4 Minimum distance, 
Constraint 9, Constraint 10 Size ratio, Shape/Angularity, 
Alignment/Pattern 
  
  
  
  
  
Thematic Constraints Generic Constraints 
  
Minimum size, 
Minimum distance, Separation, 
Self-intersection, Amalgamation, 
Shape/Angularity, Size ratio, 
Alignment/Pattern, 
Neighborhood relations, 
Spatial context, Aggregability, 
Visual balance 
Constraint 9 
Constraint 10 
Constraint 11 
Constraint 12 
  
  
Thematic Constraints Generic Constraints 
  
  
Minimum size, 
Minimum distance, Separation, 
Self-intersection, 
Shape/Angularity, Size ratio, 
Alignment/Pattern, 
Neighborhood relations, 
Spatial context, Visual balance 
Constraint 3 
Constraint 4 
Constraint 5 
Constraint 6 
Constraint 7 
Constraint 9 
Constraint 10 
  
  
  
  
Figure 1 The Integration of Thematic Constraints with Generic 
Constraints 
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF SOIL MAP 
GENERALIZATION 
Section 2 investigates the main thematic constraints in different 
phases of generalization process. Then section 3 analyzes the 
relationship and integration between thematic constraints and 
generic constraints. In this section, two special problems about 
soil map generalization will be discussed to further illustrate the 
importance of thematic constraints and the integration with 
generic constraints. 
(1) Transformation of soil category 
Transformation of soil category is to transform soil categories 
of soil parcels from the lower level to the higher one. We 
employ Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST) as the base of soil 
mapping, in which the order from higher level to lower level is 
soil order, soil suborder, soil group, soil subgroup, soil genus 
and soil series, respectively. 
- Generalization based on paper map: More than one 
level of soil category are represented in many paper 
maps to portray soil distribution (e.g. The Soil Atlas of 
China 1986, The Land-resources Atlas of Beijing 1990, The 
Atlas of The Changjiang River Basin 1999). For example, 
the soil map (1:600000) in the Land-resources Atlas of 
Beijing portrays soil group or subgroup by filling-color 
method and marks numbers on each colored soil parcel to 
distinguish different soil genus in a same soil group or 
subgroup. The basic soil parcel represents soil genus. When 
the map is used as the base map to produce a new map with 
smaller scale, the category level of soil genus is neglected 
and the soil parcels are merged: with their neighbouring 
parcels which belong in the same soil group or subgroup. In 
the final map, the basic soil parcel represents soil group or 
subgroup. 
- Generalization based on soil database: The strategy of 
generalization varies with the different database. Zhang ef 
al. (2003) introduces the soil classification coding system of 
Chinese soil database at the scale of 1111000000. The soil 
category can be encoded with 7 digitals. Soil order, soil 
group and subgroup are represented by the first, the second 
and the third digital respectively. And soil genus and the 
code of soil profile are represented by the combination of 
the fourth and fifth one, and the last two digitals 
respectively. The format of soil category code contains 
potentially the classification system of soil category. 
Therefore, the soil category can be easily transformed from 
higher category to lower one by omitting the latter digitals. 
If soil database does not involve any classification system 
of soil category, a classification system should be built first 
based on the database and the purpose of the objective map. 
Then the soil category can be transformed from lower level 
to higher level according to Constraint 5, 6 and 7. After 
generalization, the basic soil parcels in the derived database 
represents the lower categories. 
(2) Generalization of soil complex 
Soil complex is a special representation in soil map. Therefore, 
the generalization of soil complex is a special issue which is not 
involved in the generalization of other kinds of data or maps. 
The category transformation of soil complex has been discussed 
in Constraint 8 in detail. There are two situations relate to soil 
complex during the phrase of the graphic generalization. The 
first one mentioned in Constraint 11 associates several simple 
soil parcels into one new soil complex to solve graphic conflict. 
The second situation is to solve the conflicts caused by the 
present soil complex in the map or database. For example, one 
soil complex is smaller than the minimal area. There are some 
alternatives to deal with it. The first one is to associate the soil 
complex with its neighbouring soil parcels into one new soil 
complex with more soil categories if its neighbouring soil 
parcels are also smaller than the minimal area. The second one 
208 
Inter: 
is to 
neigh 
to th 
small 
In bri 
soil 
chara 
In th: 
chara 
consi 
categ 
const 
cartog 
proce 
benef 
with 
const 
specil 
provii 
comp 
map. 
repre: 
about 
const 
data a 
Chine 
Scien 
Taxor 
Scien 
Beard 
Butter 
Makir 
Long 
Galan 
Multi 
Unive 
Gong 
Distril 
Taxon 
16, SC 
Huang 
Ariel 
China 
Liao 
Mapp 
Liu, * 
Ph.D. 
Lu € 
Hong) 
in larg
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.