NGE
ttracted serious
for the accurate
nera. In the first
irgets were then
2 a network was
oints were then
earity condition
oniwa 1977 and
nethod and the
Its obtained for
ation is given in
's for the
| direction
cations
ghest possible
est granularity
1e object being
otion blur was
| 2 demonstrate
d with a faster
by slow film
by fast film
2.3 Signalized targets
To determine the shape of the signalized target that could be
more easily identified and pointed in an image, series of targets
with different shapes were designed (Figure 2). These targets
were then installed on a surface. Photographs were taken from
these targets and the potential of identification and pointing the
target centers were experimentally evaluated. The evaluation
result indicated that the shapes of the targets are not important
as regards the pointing precision. However, amongst the targets
that were recorded with a small viewing angle, circular targets
indicated better pointing precision.
To determine the minimum target size, Dm, the following
relation is adopted:
S
Lin =d— (D
f
where d is the diameter of the measuring mark; s is the camera
object distance and / denotes the camera focal length. With the
view to the analysis described above, circular targets with
diameters of 2 cm were prepared and installed in appropriate
places on the body of the Patrol car (Figure 4). To cover the
entire body of the car, 120 targets were used. The overall
interval between the adjacent targets was about 40 cm.
r
Figure 4. Patrol car and the installed targets
2.4 Geodetic network
The 3D object coordinates of the targets with respect to a local
geodetic network were determined using the Sokkia Power Set
1000 total station (Figure 4). The accuracy was estimated to be
0.1 mm and 1 second for the distance and angle measurements
respectively.
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
2.5 Photogrammetric network
The network for the imaging stations were designed based on
the well known q factor included in the following relation:
> 28,5 2
c, (2)
Jk
where g. is the overall accuracy in the object space; k is the
average number of the photographs taken from each station;
O; denotes the average accuracy of the image point
measurement and S is the average image scale given by:
Ya (3)
where c is the principal distance of the camera. For a
geometrically rigorous photogrammetric network, q factor is
considered to vary from 0.6 to 0.7. By taking into account all
constraints for the photogrammetric network design and with
several trial and error procedures, the final network presented in
Figure 5 was designed.
50 m
ui (xs
5.6
8.00 m
Figure 5. The designed photogrammetric network
2.6 Image coordinates measurement
To achieve high accuracy for the image coordinates
measurements, Leica SD2000 an analytical plotter is used
(Figure 6). The accuracy of the image points measurement were
evaluated using a reseau plate. The largest error for the check
points on the reseau plate was about 1.75 micrometer using the
affine transformation. Figure 7 gives the vector plot of the
residual errors.
Figure 6. Leica SD2000 analytical plotter