Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

  
   
  
bul 2004 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
aluation. | 
amera at | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
  
or of 13 
hown in 
ad been 
  
tation 
ctively. 
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
Figure 3. 3D design of the object. 
3.2 Laser Scanning Method: 
The study area had been scanned by using local coordinate 
system. During scanning process with control points each 
different parts side of building had been located for registration 
process. Cyrax HSD2500 sensitive specific targets had been 
used. The three side of building was scanned with 6 mm point 
diameter. All scanned sides of building registered with 1,4 mm. 
accuracy and 3D point cloud model of the building was 
generated (Figure 4). 
  
Figure 4. Point clouds of whole building 
3D modelling of the laser scanned study area has been done by 
using Cyclone software. Single patches of surfaces have been 
created for modelling. This process had been completed by 
selecting point clouds and creating fitting patches of them. If 
the modelling of the big surfaces made from small patches, 
because of the fitting problems some error can arise. The 
patches have to be edited by user to solve this problem, and 
then the patches can be fitted on their true surface. The 3D 
editing possibility of software makes that easier. However this 
process could be done with automatically mesh generation 
process, but in this study the 3D modelling has been realised 
only by using interactive method (Figure 5,6). Only the side 
evaluated by photogrammetric method had been modelled. 
Figure 6. Different perspective of 3D model 
3.3 Comparing two methods 
The 3D outlines created by photogrammetric system and 3D 
modelling created by evaluating laser scanned data had been 
overlapped (Figure 7). 
  
Figure 7. Overlapped models 
Coordinates of 60 specific points as corners had been measured 
from two products. Residuals vx, vy, vz had been calculated by 
difference of coordinates (Table 2). 
  
ovx(m) ovy (m) | ovz(m) 
0.0145 0.049 0.069 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 2.Standart deviations of residuals 
     
    
    
   
   
  
  
  
  
    
   
    
    
   
   
  
  
  
  
     
    
    
     
    
   
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.