International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004
3.4 Fusion of two methods
Through the combined use of photogrammetric and scanning
data, the geometry of any kind of object can be fully captured.
Moreover, new products can be available, such as the
production of '3D orthophotos', which is the orthoprojection of
photos onto a unified dense DTM of the whole object derived
from laser scanner data (Ionnidis , 2003).
Ortohophotos that had been created by photogrammetric
systems, represent 3D coordinates of an image. Orthophotos
contain texture information also. The model had been created
by laser scanning data may not contain texture information of
object. This problem can be solved by fusion of laser datas and
single photograph that had been taken by metric camera.
For fusion of laser scanning data and the rectificated
photograph of study area has been overlapped and formed at
coordinate system of local laser scanning data (Figure 8).
After this process the DEM and the rectified photograph had
been overlapped and the result product (orthophoto) created
(Figure 10,1 1.12).
Figure 10. Orthophoto of study object
Figure 8. Reftificated single photograph.
The last years laser scanning has become a reliable and
economic technology to build up high class DEM
(Knabenschuh, 1999).
The DEM file was created by using point clouds. At the
beginning the TINs had been created, after the mesh of study
area had been generated. (Figure 9)
Figure 9. Digital Elevation Model.
Figure 12. Overlapping orthophoto and 3D photogrammetrical
design
4. CONCLUSIONS
Nowadays, the usage of laser scanning systems has an
important role for data acquisition and being realized easily.
Interactive modelling at laser scanning systems is easier than
photogrammetric systems. Operator does photogrammetric
evaluation on the plane at this method. Namely operator can't
rotate in 3D space. Whereas model could be done by operator in
3D space. This occurrence is become because of concept
differences of two methods.
Internatio
In this sti
data proci
tools. Esp
efficient];
triangles,
not be mc
the mesh |
In this stu
were tak
comparin;
systems n
close ran
important
photograr
and laser
informatic
We sugge
=
will be mc
Baily, B..
digital ph
of Geom
University
Barber, D
Century ^
New Cast
Bornaz, L
of Laser
-Dipartim
Abruzzi, 1
Gordon, €
laser scar
USA
lonnidis ,
the Docu
Combined
Knabensc
Data for
Week, Bor
Schulz, T.
and Appli
Week, Ma
Vozikis,
Recording
Wehr, A.,
Data. C/P,
The author
Germany :
applicatior