Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 
  
sketches (Fig. 10a). Due to the lines of sight to the surrounded, 
precisely labelled or numbered summits it was previously 
assumed that Pfyffer created these drawings in connection with 
his surveying. However, a recent analysis with the help of 
landscape models has shown that the sketches were created and 
also used much later for the formation of the relief surface. 
Their distorted geometry excludes any systematic, perspective 
or panorama-like landscape projection, whereas the quality and 
excessive details of the morphology are amazing (Fig. 10). The 
computer-generated views confirm Pfyffer's concentration on 
the forms of selected mountains and his disregarding of 
geometric aspects in the surrounding area. The crucial point of 
the analysis was to find the places where the sketches had been 
drawn, which was not an easy task due to the distortions, 
unusual fields of view and missing or confusing station 
descriptions. 
4. PFYFFER'S PROCEEDURES AND RESULTS IN 
EUROPEAN COMPARISON 
The first product of modern geodesy and systematic land 
survey was the Carte géometrique de la France (1739-1793) at 
a scale of 1:86'400. The state- and military supported mapping 
of France under the direction of four generations of the Cassini 
family was based on one superordinate and two subordinate, 
computationally evaluated triangulation networks. With the 
exception of this work, nearly all other 18th century maps were 
created applying similar procedures and instruments to those of 
Pfyffer. The following outstanding cartographic products based 
on graphical triangulation using a plane table and simple 
instruments to measure angles can be mentioned: 
e The huge work of military officers of the Habsburg 
monarchy at a scale of 1:28'800, created within the first, so 
called Joseph's survey (Josephinische Landesaufnahme, 
1764-1787) and covering several countries of today's 
central and eastern Europe. 
e The Atlas Tyrolensis at a scale of 1:103'000, created by P. 
Anich and B. Hueber between 1760 and 1769. The atlas 
depicts a large area of northern Tyrol in Austria. 
e  Schmettaus map of Preussen (Schmettausche 
Kabinettskarte, 1767-1787) at a scale of mostly 1:50'000, 
covering a big part of present Germany. 
e. Schmit's map of south Germany (Schmittsche Karte, 
1793-1797) at a scale of 1:57'600. 
e The Atlas Suisse (1786-1802) at a scale of about 1:110'000 
by J. R. Meyer, J. H. Weiss und J. E. Müller. The atlas 
displays the entire area of Switzerland. 
In order to be able to interpret the geometric quality of Pfyffer's 
topographic work (Table 1), the results of numerical evaluation 
of other maps of that period must be taken into consideration. 
Unfortunately, the research on accuracy analysis of 18th 
century maps is very rare and in addition, the measures used to 
express map accuracy are usually very diverse. The numeric 
results of several investigations are shown in the following: 
e According to (Finsterwalder, 1988), the mean position 
error of 38 identical points of the distortion grid of the 
mentioned Schmittsche Karte (1793-1797) of south 
Germany is +2.5 km. The middle distance error of this 
map by the average distance of 15 km amounts to +1 km. 
e (Brunner, 2002) analyzed the accuracy of the first 
topographic land survey of Sachsen in Germany (so called 
Meilenblátter. 1780-1825). This map at a scale of 1:12'000 
is based on theodolite measurements and a numerically 
evaluated one-step triangulation. Within the accuracy 
analysis, the map sheet size was compared with its to-be 
value of one local mile (6796.56 m). The map is very 
precise: the 15 sclected map sheets created in 1785, 1797 
and 1810 deviate from this value in average of 3 m, 68 m 
and 14 m respectively. 
e As a representative of Swiss 18th century maps, the 
already mentioned Atlas Suisse (1786-1802) - considered 
to be the best map of the country until the first official land 
survey - was analyzed within the presented project. For the 
accuracy analysis the sheet Nr. 7 covering the area of 
Central Switzerland was selected. The evaluation using 
115 identical points and applying the same procedures as 
those for the maps of Pfyffer (Section 2) resulted in the 
sigma a posteriori of 335 m in the X- and 247 m in the Y- 
direction respectively. 
The way of creation of the above listed European maps provide 
evidence that at the time of Pfyffer's surveying and relief 
construction (1750-1786) his procedures and instruments were 
up to scientific standards of that period. His results hold well 
with the accuracy of contemporary maps and in particular, his 
substantial contribution lies in performing pioneering area-wide 
height measurements and detailed 3D modelling. Considering 
the conditions under which the relief was constructed - an 
unfavourable age for landscape exploration and surveying in 
Switzerland and a large mountainous area modelled at a large 
scale - Franz Ludwig Pfyffer's achievement is admirable even 
from today's point of view. 
5. CONCLUSIONS 
Finished in 1786, Pfyffer's relief attracted numerous visitors 
from all over Europe to Lucerne. Its unusual bird's eye 
perspective of an inaccessible mountain barrier was an absolute 
novelty, a virtual flight in the age of enlightenment. However, 
with the appearance of new, more precise maps at the turn of 
the century the opinions on the topographic quality of the relief 
started to change; the relief was reduced to a kind of handicraft 
and had almost been forgotten. Due to its complexity and a lack 
of primary documentation the relief was never investigated 
until the procedures of photogrammetry and image analysis 
allowed for drawing conclusions from the geometric evaluation. 
The results of the presented interdisciplinary research give the 
painstaking work of Pfyffer its original value back again. The 
relief must be considered an excellent topographic achievement 
of that time and a milestone on the way to modern cartography. 
REFERENCES 
Brunner, H., 2002: Wie Sachsen vermessen wurde. Die 
Meilenblätter und die kursächsische Landesvermessung von 
1780 bis 1825. Dresden, pp. 91-92. 
Finsterwalder, R., 1988: Massstab und Genauigkeit alter Karten 
- gezeigt an einigen Kartierungen Bayerns. In: Cartographia 
Bavariae: Bayern im Bild der Karte, München, pp. 193-211. 
Fischer, G., Schnegg, P.-A., 1994: Updating the geomagnetic 
survey of Switzerland, in Matériaux pour la Géologie de la 
Suisse. Géophysique No 27. Neuchátel, Fig. 2. 
Niederüst, J., 2003: A bird's eye view on Switzerland in the 
18" century: 3D recording and analysis of a historical relief 
model. IAPRS, Volume XXXIV-5/C15, pp. 589-594. 
Pfyffer, F. L., 1761: 10 letters of Pfyffer to Micheli du Crest, 
from April 28 to September 15. Landecy, Arch. Micheli, 
Papiers JBMC no 720bis. 
     
   
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
    
  
   
    
  
   
   
  
  
   
   
  
   
   
   
  
   
   
   
  
  
   
   
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
    
    
KEY 
ABS 
The 
Im h 
inclu 
envil 
digit 
the 11 
to m 
meas 
This 
phot 
moni 
allov 
integ 
gene 
ensui 
Syste 
elem 
The 
in Bi 
and 
thirte 
colla 
paint 
the 
mate 
The 
joine 
carve 
was 
of w 
WOOK 
entir 
paint 
embe 
seen. 
stain 
scen 
toget 
and ( 
The 
half 
and 
losse 
dame
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.